"We have more patents on pigmented inks than anybody else"
About this Quote
Bragging about “patents on pigmented inks” sounds like a narrow flex until you hear the era behind it: the early modern state discovering that paperwork is power. For a 16th-century statesman, ink is not stationery. Ink is border control, taxation, conscription, land titles, church edicts, trade licenses - the entire administrative machine that turns authority into something legible and enforceable.
The specific intent is to signal dominance in infrastructure disguised as a technical detail. “More than anybody else” frames sovereignty as an arms race of intellectual property: our bureaucracy is not only bigger, it is proprietary. Pigmented inks matter because they endure. They resist fading, smudging, tampering. In a world where legitimacy lives on paper seals and handwritten records, durable pigment is a quiet anti-forgery technology. Owning patents on it implies control over authenticity itself: who can produce official-looking documents, who can archive them, who can keep a stable record when rivals’ ledgers rot into ambiguity.
The subtext is classic statecraft: innovation presented as inevitability. Perez isn’t selling artistry; he’s selling permanence, standardization, and monopoly. If your ink is the best, your decrees travel farther and survive longer. If your ink is legally protected, you can ration its supply, bake revenue into every contract, and make dependence look like “quality.”
It’s a line that reveals a modern instinct before “modernity” had a name: power consolidates not only through armies, but through the technologies that make institutions stick.
The specific intent is to signal dominance in infrastructure disguised as a technical detail. “More than anybody else” frames sovereignty as an arms race of intellectual property: our bureaucracy is not only bigger, it is proprietary. Pigmented inks matter because they endure. They resist fading, smudging, tampering. In a world where legitimacy lives on paper seals and handwritten records, durable pigment is a quiet anti-forgery technology. Owning patents on it implies control over authenticity itself: who can produce official-looking documents, who can archive them, who can keep a stable record when rivals’ ledgers rot into ambiguity.
The subtext is classic statecraft: innovation presented as inevitability. Perez isn’t selling artistry; he’s selling permanence, standardization, and monopoly. If your ink is the best, your decrees travel farther and survive longer. If your ink is legally protected, you can ration its supply, bake revenue into every contract, and make dependence look like “quality.”
It’s a line that reveals a modern instinct before “modernity” had a name: power consolidates not only through armies, but through the technologies that make institutions stick.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Antonio
Add to List
