"We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts"
About this Quote
Diplomatic language rarely sounds like a shrug, yet that is exactly the effect of April Glaspie’s line: “We have no opinion on the Arab-Arab conflicts.” It’s a sentence engineered to be antiseptic - the kind of phrasing that pretends to remove the speaker from the room even as it quietly rearranges the furniture.
The intent reads as classic nonalignment. A U.S. diplomat signals restraint, avoids entanglement, and preserves flexibility: we are not here to referee, we are not taking sides, don’t drag us into your regional quarrels. The syntax helps: “no opinion” is stronger than “no comment,” implying not just silence but deliberate neutrality, as if moral judgment itself is outside the job description.
The subtext is where it bites. In high-stakes geopolitics, neutrality is never neutral; it is a policy choice with consequences. Saying you have “no opinion” can be heard as “no red line,” an invitation for ambitious leaders to test boundaries. It also performs a kind of paternal distance: regional actors are framed as locked in “Arab-Arab” disputes, while the great power hovers above, ostensibly impartial, practically decisive.
Context matters because Glaspie’s name is tethered to the lead-up to Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait, when every syllable from Washington was parsed for permission or warning. In that atmosphere, a statement meant to de-escalate can function as a diplomatic blind spot, broadcasting ambiguity where deterrence depends on clarity. The quote works because it exposes the thin seam between procedure and power: the soft voice that can still move armies.
The intent reads as classic nonalignment. A U.S. diplomat signals restraint, avoids entanglement, and preserves flexibility: we are not here to referee, we are not taking sides, don’t drag us into your regional quarrels. The syntax helps: “no opinion” is stronger than “no comment,” implying not just silence but deliberate neutrality, as if moral judgment itself is outside the job description.
The subtext is where it bites. In high-stakes geopolitics, neutrality is never neutral; it is a policy choice with consequences. Saying you have “no opinion” can be heard as “no red line,” an invitation for ambitious leaders to test boundaries. It also performs a kind of paternal distance: regional actors are framed as locked in “Arab-Arab” disputes, while the great power hovers above, ostensibly impartial, practically decisive.
Context matters because Glaspie’s name is tethered to the lead-up to Iraq’s 1990 invasion of Kuwait, when every syllable from Washington was parsed for permission or warning. In that atmosphere, a statement meant to de-escalate can function as a diplomatic blind spot, broadcasting ambiguity where deterrence depends on clarity. The quote works because it exposes the thin seam between procedure and power: the soft voice that can still move armies.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Memorandum of conversation (Amb. April Glaspie and Saddam Hussein), Baghdad, July 25, 1990; reported in New York Times article "U.S. Envoy Said to Tell Hussein U.S. Has No Opinion on His Territorial Disputes," July 28, 1990. |
More Quotes by April
Add to List
