"We have really good data that show when you take patients and you really inform them about their choices, patients make more frugal choices. They pick more efficient choices than the health care system does"
About this Quote
Berwick’s line reads like a technocrat’s mic drop: the cheapest lever in American health care isn’t a new drug or a tougher regulator, it’s an informed patient. The phrasing matters. “Really good data” is a credential flash, an appeal to the evidence culture that policymakers trust when ideology gets noisy. He’s not asking you to believe in patient empowerment as a feel-good ideal; he’s claiming it performs.
The provocation sits in the comparison: patients, once educated, choose “more efficient” care “than the health care system does.” That’s a polite indictment. It implies the system’s default settings are not optimized for outcomes or value but for throughput, habit, defensive medicine, and payment incentives that reward doing more. By framing it as a gap between human choice and institutional behavior, Berwick sidesteps blaming individual doctors and instead points to structural misalignment: the system overproduces care when no one has both the information and the authority to say no.
“Frugal” is also a carefully chosen word. It’s morally flattering without being austerity-coded. Frugality suggests prudence, not deprivation; stewardship, not rationing. In U.S. politics, “rationing” is toxic, so Berwick reframes cost control as the natural consequence of respect: tell people the truth about tradeoffs and many will decline marginal interventions.
Contextually, this fits Berwick’s long-running project (from IHI to CMS): quality and cost are not enemies if you remove waste and align incentives. The subtext is a challenge to paternalism and to a market where the “consumer” is famously unable to shop. His bet is that transparency and shared decision-making can do what price signals often can’t: cool demand for low-value care without pretending illness is a normal marketplace.
The provocation sits in the comparison: patients, once educated, choose “more efficient” care “than the health care system does.” That’s a polite indictment. It implies the system’s default settings are not optimized for outcomes or value but for throughput, habit, defensive medicine, and payment incentives that reward doing more. By framing it as a gap between human choice and institutional behavior, Berwick sidesteps blaming individual doctors and instead points to structural misalignment: the system overproduces care when no one has both the information and the authority to say no.
“Frugal” is also a carefully chosen word. It’s morally flattering without being austerity-coded. Frugality suggests prudence, not deprivation; stewardship, not rationing. In U.S. politics, “rationing” is toxic, so Berwick reframes cost control as the natural consequence of respect: tell people the truth about tradeoffs and many will decline marginal interventions.
Contextually, this fits Berwick’s long-running project (from IHI to CMS): quality and cost are not enemies if you remove waste and align incentives. The subtext is a challenge to paternalism and to a market where the “consumer” is famously unable to shop. His bet is that transparency and shared decision-making can do what price signals often can’t: cool demand for low-value care without pretending illness is a normal marketplace.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|
More Quotes by Donald
Add to List

