"We have shown, given these last three years, that we were succeeding in fighting terrorists. While during the first 30 years of the former governments they didn't"

Alberto Fujimori's statement can be evaluated from a number of angles, consisting of political, historic, and rhetorical viewpoints.

First of all, Fujimori is highlighting what he perceives as the success of his administration in fighting terrorism, comparing it favorably to the efforts of previous federal governments over a much longer duration-- 30 years. The emphasis on "these last 3 years" points to a fairly short timeframe in which his government made considerable strides in resolving the terrorist risk. This suggests that Fujimori is taking credit for a definitive shift in strategy or effectiveness compared to his predecessors.

Historically, the context of Fujimori's presidency is crucial. He served as the President of Peru from 1990 to 2000, a period during which the country faced severe challenges from insurgent groups, most especially the Shining Path (Sendero Luminoso) and the Túpac Amaru Revolutionary Movement (MRTA). Throughout the early years of his presidency, Fujimori's federal government implemented aggressive security measures and relied on military interventions that were pivotal in damaging these insurgent groups.

It's crucial to consider that Fujimori's rhetoric is targeted at legitimizing his federal government's questionable strategies, which included human rights infractions such as extrajudicial killings and required disappearances. By stressing his administration's success, he tries to validate these actions by the outcome-- the decreased threat of terrorism.

Rhetorically, Fujimori employs a method of contrast to boost his administration's accomplishments. By juxtaposing his 3 years of success against the thirty years of "failure" by previous federal governments, he frames his management as both transformative and effective. This not just raises his administration's actions however implicitly criticizes the methods (or lack thereof) taken by his predecessors, placing him as a more capable and effective leader.

In conclusion, Fujimori's statement is a multi-layered assertion of victory, one that seeks to highlight his administration's accomplishments while glossing over the questionable and typically criticized approaches used to achieve those successes. It reflects a common political story technique: emphasizing results to overshadow controversial processes.