"We have the power to change the world for the better. The question is, do we have the will?"
About this Quote
The line lands like a moral audit disguised as a pep talk. Peter Knights, speaking as an activist, starts by granting the audience a comforting premise: the tools exist, agency exists, history is pliable. That first sentence is deliberately broad, almost TED-friendly, because it’s meant to recruit across tribes. Then he twists it. The second sentence yanks the listener out of the warm bath of possibility and into the cold shower of responsibility.
“Power” here isn’t superhero fantasy; it’s the unglamorous sum of modern capacity: money, technology, institutional leverage, the ability to coordinate at scale. Knights’ subtext is that we’ve already solved the hardest problem on paper. We know how to reduce suffering, protect ecosystems, curb violence, reform systems. The barrier isn’t discovery, it’s desire - or more precisely, the willingness to endure inconvenience, conflict, and sacrifice. Activism lives and dies in that gap between what’s feasible and what’s comfortable.
The rhetorical move is also a quiet indictment of spectatorship. “Do we have the will?” implicates the reader without naming a villain, which is strategic in coalition politics: shame just enough to motivate, not enough to alienate. It reframes despair as a choice, too. If the world doesn’t improve, it won’t be because fate was stronger; it’ll be because comfort, cynicism, or short-term self-interest beat commitment.
Contextually, it fits an era saturated with evidence and starving for follow-through: climate targets missed, inequality normalized, outrage monetized. Knights isn’t asking whether change is possible. He’s asking who we are when possibility demands a price.
“Power” here isn’t superhero fantasy; it’s the unglamorous sum of modern capacity: money, technology, institutional leverage, the ability to coordinate at scale. Knights’ subtext is that we’ve already solved the hardest problem on paper. We know how to reduce suffering, protect ecosystems, curb violence, reform systems. The barrier isn’t discovery, it’s desire - or more precisely, the willingness to endure inconvenience, conflict, and sacrifice. Activism lives and dies in that gap between what’s feasible and what’s comfortable.
The rhetorical move is also a quiet indictment of spectatorship. “Do we have the will?” implicates the reader without naming a villain, which is strategic in coalition politics: shame just enough to motivate, not enough to alienate. It reframes despair as a choice, too. If the world doesn’t improve, it won’t be because fate was stronger; it’ll be because comfort, cynicism, or short-term self-interest beat commitment.
Contextually, it fits an era saturated with evidence and starving for follow-through: climate targets missed, inequality normalized, outrage monetized. Knights isn’t asking whether change is possible. He’s asking who we are when possibility demands a price.
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|
More Quotes by Peter
Add to List









