"We have three billion people, half the world's population today, living on less than two dollars a day"
About this Quote
Three billion is the kind of number that refuses to stay abstract. Wolfensohn drops it like a weight on the table, then tightens the screw: “half the world” and “less than two dollars a day.” The phrasing is engineered to corner you. It’s not a poetic lament; it’s a boardroom-grade indictment, built out of clean ratios and a brutally low threshold that even affluent audiences can instantly feel in their gut. Two dollars isn’t a “poverty line” so much as a moral dare: imagine trying to live inside a figure you might spend without noticing.
The intent reads as mobilization through arithmetic. As a businessman (and, in public life, the kind who spoke fluently to ministers and markets), Wolfensohn frames deprivation as a systemic condition, not a personal failure. The subtext is a rebuke to global complacency: if poverty sits at the scale of “half the world,” then charity-as-afterthought is laughably inadequate. This is poverty as a stability problem, a legitimacy problem, a failure of the post-Cold War victory lap.
The context matters: late-20th- and early-21st-century globalization sold itself on rising tides, but also produced winners fluent in capital and losers trapped in informal work, debt, and fragile states. By choosing a stark income metric, he speaks the language of institutions that measure, lend, and impose conditions. The irony is embedded: the same systems capable of producing billion-dollar deals can’t produce two-dollar dignity for billions.
The intent reads as mobilization through arithmetic. As a businessman (and, in public life, the kind who spoke fluently to ministers and markets), Wolfensohn frames deprivation as a systemic condition, not a personal failure. The subtext is a rebuke to global complacency: if poverty sits at the scale of “half the world,” then charity-as-afterthought is laughably inadequate. This is poverty as a stability problem, a legitimacy problem, a failure of the post-Cold War victory lap.
The context matters: late-20th- and early-21st-century globalization sold itself on rising tides, but also produced winners fluent in capital and losers trapped in informal work, debt, and fragile states. By choosing a stark income metric, he speaks the language of institutions that measure, lend, and impose conditions. The irony is embedded: the same systems capable of producing billion-dollar deals can’t produce two-dollar dignity for billions.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
