"We have to fight radical Islam wherever it exists. It's in Afghanistan, it's in Saudi Arabia, throughout the Middle-East in big numbers and it's in the United States"
About this Quote
Tancredo’s line is built to do two things at once: sound like a hawkish national-security truism while quietly stretching the battlefield to include domestic political opponents and immigrant communities. The phrase “radical Islam” functions less as a precise descriptor than as a rhetorical solvent. It dissolves distinctions between ideology, religion, geography, citizenship, and individual culpability. That vagueness is the point: it keeps the target broad, flexible, and emotionally legible.
“Wherever it exists” sets up a moral absolute, but the list that follows is the real engine. Afghanistan is the expected post-9/11 reference; Saudi Arabia is the insinuation that the problem is not just “over there” with obvious enemies but also within allied, oil-rich partners. “Throughout the Middle-East in big numbers” is conspicuously imprecise, trading specificity for scale-anxiety. Then comes the pivot: “and it’s in the United States.” That final clause drags foreign policy language into the domestic sphere, inviting listeners to treat internal pluralism as a security front.
Context matters. Tancredo’s political brand was hardline on immigration and cultural assimilation during the mid-2000s, when “war on terror” rhetoric blurred into debates about borders, mosques, and surveillance. The quote’s intent isn’t simply to name a threat; it’s to authorize a posture: suspicion as civic virtue, preemption as policy, and the idea that loyalty must be continuously proved. The subtext is a demand for an expansive mandate - not just to fight terrorists, but to police identity.
“Wherever it exists” sets up a moral absolute, but the list that follows is the real engine. Afghanistan is the expected post-9/11 reference; Saudi Arabia is the insinuation that the problem is not just “over there” with obvious enemies but also within allied, oil-rich partners. “Throughout the Middle-East in big numbers” is conspicuously imprecise, trading specificity for scale-anxiety. Then comes the pivot: “and it’s in the United States.” That final clause drags foreign policy language into the domestic sphere, inviting listeners to treat internal pluralism as a security front.
Context matters. Tancredo’s political brand was hardline on immigration and cultural assimilation during the mid-2000s, when “war on terror” rhetoric blurred into debates about borders, mosques, and surveillance. The quote’s intent isn’t simply to name a threat; it’s to authorize a posture: suspicion as civic virtue, preemption as policy, and the idea that loyalty must be continuously proved. The subtext is a demand for an expansive mandate - not just to fight terrorists, but to police identity.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Tom
Add to List


