"We immigrants can sometimes sound a little hysterical about this because we come from places that have tried this and we know where it leads. Anybody who's lived in countries with socialized health care knows that it becomes the dominant political issue"
About this Quote
Steyn’s line is built to launder an ideological warning through the voice of lived experience. By opening with “We immigrants,” he claims a kind of moral credential: not just opinion, but testimony. The little self-deprecating “sound a little hysterical” is a preemptive dodge - he concedes the emotional charge so critics can’t weaponize it, then immediately reframes that charge as rational alarm: we’re not panicking, we’re remembering.
The sentence is also a neat bit of pressure politics. “Places that have tried this” stays conveniently vague, collapsing wildly different national systems into a single cautionary tale. It invites the listener to supply their own feared example - Britain, Canada, the old Eastern Bloc - and to treat “socialized health care” as a slippery slope rather than a policy design. “We know where it leads” is the payoff: a prophecy with no details, which is precisely why it’s useful. The less specified the endpoint, the more adaptable the dread.
His second move - “Anybody who’s lived…” - is rhetorical annexation. It declares consensus by definition, turning dissent into disqualification: if you disagree, you must not have really been there. The claim that health care becomes “the dominant political issue” isn’t accidental; it implies a zero-sum politics where public systems crowd out everything else, quietly suggesting governmental overreach and perpetual crisis.
Contextually, the quote reads like a post-1990s, pre-ACA-era talking point sharpened for American audiences: importing an immigrant’s authority to argue that a European-style safety net is not compassionate modernity but a trap that reorganizes politics around scarcity, waiting, and state power.
The sentence is also a neat bit of pressure politics. “Places that have tried this” stays conveniently vague, collapsing wildly different national systems into a single cautionary tale. It invites the listener to supply their own feared example - Britain, Canada, the old Eastern Bloc - and to treat “socialized health care” as a slippery slope rather than a policy design. “We know where it leads” is the payoff: a prophecy with no details, which is precisely why it’s useful. The less specified the endpoint, the more adaptable the dread.
His second move - “Anybody who’s lived…” - is rhetorical annexation. It declares consensus by definition, turning dissent into disqualification: if you disagree, you must not have really been there. The claim that health care becomes “the dominant political issue” isn’t accidental; it implies a zero-sum politics where public systems crowd out everything else, quietly suggesting governmental overreach and perpetual crisis.
Contextually, the quote reads like a post-1990s, pre-ACA-era talking point sharpened for American audiences: importing an immigrant’s authority to argue that a European-style safety net is not compassionate modernity but a trap that reorganizes politics around scarcity, waiting, and state power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Mark
Add to List
