"We know the ideal isn't where the action is"
About this Quote
A single line that quietly punctures a whole genre of moral self-congratulation, Epstein’s “We know the ideal isn’t where the action is” treats lofty principle as a spectator sport: admired, invoked, and reliably kept at a safe distance from the messy arena where decisions actually happen. The “we” matters. It’s communal, almost conspiratorial, suggesting this is not a private failing but a shared social arrangement: everyone understands that ideals are ornamental, yet we continue to speak as if they’re operational.
The line works because it refuses the comforting fiction that hypocrisy is an exception. Epstein implies it’s a feature of modern life, especially among the educated classes who trade in ideals the way others trade in commodities. “Ideal” is singular and abstract, a polished object. “Action” is blunt, physical, plural in its consequences. The sentence sets up a clean spatial metaphor - ideals over here, action over there - then shrugs at the distance as if it’s common sense. That shrug is the sting.
Contextually, it reads like Epstein at his most characteristic: skeptical of posturing, attentive to social comedy, interested in how people manage to feel decent while behaving strategically. It also hints at the institutional reality of politics, academia, and culture-making, where the rhetoric of ideals is useful precisely because it’s untestable. If the ideal ever moved into the arena of action, it would acquire fingerprints, compromises, and failures - and stop being ideal. Epstein’s point isn’t that ideals are worthless; it’s that we often prefer them unspent, like moral capital that earns interest only when it’s never cashed.
The line works because it refuses the comforting fiction that hypocrisy is an exception. Epstein implies it’s a feature of modern life, especially among the educated classes who trade in ideals the way others trade in commodities. “Ideal” is singular and abstract, a polished object. “Action” is blunt, physical, plural in its consequences. The sentence sets up a clean spatial metaphor - ideals over here, action over there - then shrugs at the distance as if it’s common sense. That shrug is the sting.
Contextually, it reads like Epstein at his most characteristic: skeptical of posturing, attentive to social comedy, interested in how people manage to feel decent while behaving strategically. It also hints at the institutional reality of politics, academia, and culture-making, where the rhetoric of ideals is useful precisely because it’s untestable. If the ideal ever moved into the arena of action, it would acquire fingerprints, compromises, and failures - and stop being ideal. Epstein’s point isn’t that ideals are worthless; it’s that we often prefer them unspent, like moral capital that earns interest only when it’s never cashed.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Joseph
Add to List
