"We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrial civilization to collapse"
About this Quote
It reads like a threat dressed up as a lament: if the system can’t be steered, maybe it should be allowed to crash. Maurice Strong’s line weaponizes despair as leverage, turning “saving the world” into a moral trump card that can justify almost any severity. The provocation isn’t subtle. By setting “the world” against “industrial civilization,” he forces a binary where modern prosperity is framed as the enemy of planetary survival, and any defense of growth starts to smell like complicity.
The intent is partly rhetorical escalation. Strong, a businessman turned global environmental powerbroker, was central to the rise of modern climate governance (Stockholm 1972, Rio 1992). In that context, the quote functions as a pressure tactic aimed at complacent elites: you can choose managed transition now, or you can accept unmanaged collapse later. It’s the logic of triage, delivered as prophecy.
The subtext is what makes it combustible. “Industrial civilization” isn’t just smokestacks; it’s energy density, global supply chains, mass consumption, and the political legitimacy built on rising living standards. Suggesting its collapse as a remedy implicitly invites questions about who bears the cost. Collapse is never evenly distributed. It’s austerity by catastrophe, with the poorest paying first.
That’s why the sentence still circulates: not because it offers a plan, but because it clarifies a fault line inside environmental politics. Is the goal to decarbonize abundance, or to moralize scarcity? Strong’s phrasing flirts with the latter, and the flirtation is the point. It shocks the room into admitting how high the stakes really are - and how radical the alternatives become when incrementalism fails.
The intent is partly rhetorical escalation. Strong, a businessman turned global environmental powerbroker, was central to the rise of modern climate governance (Stockholm 1972, Rio 1992). In that context, the quote functions as a pressure tactic aimed at complacent elites: you can choose managed transition now, or you can accept unmanaged collapse later. It’s the logic of triage, delivered as prophecy.
The subtext is what makes it combustible. “Industrial civilization” isn’t just smokestacks; it’s energy density, global supply chains, mass consumption, and the political legitimacy built on rising living standards. Suggesting its collapse as a remedy implicitly invites questions about who bears the cost. Collapse is never evenly distributed. It’s austerity by catastrophe, with the poorest paying first.
That’s why the sentence still circulates: not because it offers a plan, but because it clarifies a fault line inside environmental politics. Is the goal to decarbonize abundance, or to moralize scarcity? Strong’s phrasing flirts with the latter, and the flirtation is the point. It shocks the room into admitting how high the stakes really are - and how radical the alternatives become when incrementalism fails.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Maurice
Add to List


