"We must combat misinformation that is being spread"
About this Quote
“We must combat misinformation that is being spread” is the kind of civic-sounding mandate that tries to float above the mess of politics while still doing political work. Starr’s phrasing is intentionally generic: no villain named, no medium specified, no standard offered for what counts as “misinformation.” That vagueness isn’t a flaw; it’s the mechanism. “We must” recruits a collective moral posture, positioning the speaker as responsible, sober, and duty-bound. “Combat” escalates the stakes into a quasi-military register, implying threat, urgency, and the legitimacy of countermeasures. The sentence asks for trust before it offers proof.
Coming from Kenneth Starr, the subtext is especially charged. Starr’s public identity was forged in the impeachment era, when “truth,” “narrative,” and “spin” weren’t abstract concerns but weapons in a high-stakes legitimacy fight. A lawyer’s relationship to truth is procedural: it’s mediated by evidence, admissibility, and rhetoric. That makes the line read less like a plea for epistemic humility and more like an assertion of authority over the boundary between fact and faction.
Context matters because “combatting misinformation” has become a bipartisan talisman: invoked to justify everything from platform moderation to government messaging to media gatekeeping. Starr’s quote sits comfortably in that post-2016 vocabulary, where anxiety about viral falsehoods merges with anxieties about who gets to arbitrate reality. The cultural bite is that the sentence can be a public service announcement or a power move, depending on who is doing the “combatting” and who gets labeled “misinformed.”
Coming from Kenneth Starr, the subtext is especially charged. Starr’s public identity was forged in the impeachment era, when “truth,” “narrative,” and “spin” weren’t abstract concerns but weapons in a high-stakes legitimacy fight. A lawyer’s relationship to truth is procedural: it’s mediated by evidence, admissibility, and rhetoric. That makes the line read less like a plea for epistemic humility and more like an assertion of authority over the boundary between fact and faction.
Context matters because “combatting misinformation” has become a bipartisan talisman: invoked to justify everything from platform moderation to government messaging to media gatekeeping. Starr’s quote sits comfortably in that post-2016 vocabulary, where anxiety about viral falsehoods merges with anxieties about who gets to arbitrate reality. The cultural bite is that the sentence can be a public service announcement or a power move, depending on who is doing the “combatting” and who gets labeled “misinformed.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Kenneth
Add to List



