"We must not let daylight in upon the magic"
About this Quote
The line’s intent is pragmatic, almost managerial. Bagehot isn’t begging people to be irrational; he’s warning that rationality has political costs. A constitutional system needs legitimacy, and legitimacy is often aesthetic before it is logical. The crown supplies a shared emotional story that Parliament alone can’t generate: continuity, dignity, a person-shaped symbol that absorbs loyalty and deflects anger. Let too much “daylight” in - let the sovereign look like a politician, or let rituals be dissected like budget items - and the institution loses its mystique, along with the stabilizing obedience that mystique purchases.
Subtext: democracy can’t survive on transparency alone. Bagehot’s cynicism is subtle but sharp; he’s admitting that modern politics, even when it preaches reason, still depends on theater. Read now, the line feels like an early user manual for public relations: keep certain fictions intact, not because they’re true, but because they’re useful.
Quote Details
| Topic | Wisdom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Bagehot, Walter. (2026, January 17). We must not let daylight in upon the magic. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-must-not-let-daylight-in-upon-the-magic-66207/
Chicago Style
Bagehot, Walter. "We must not let daylight in upon the magic." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-must-not-let-daylight-in-upon-the-magic-66207/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We must not let daylight in upon the magic." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-must-not-let-daylight-in-upon-the-magic-66207/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.











