"We must say that there are as many squares as there are numbers"
About this Quote
Galileo is smuggling a quiet bomb into a sentence that looks almost nursery-simple. “As many squares as there are numbers” isn’t an arithmetic fun fact; it’s a pressure test for common sense. In the ordinary, physical-world intuition of “more” and “less,” squares feel rarer than numbers. Most integers aren’t perfect squares, so surely the squares must be fewer. Galileo forces the reader to watch that intuition fail.
The intent sits in the paradox: you can pair every whole number n with exactly one square n^2, creating a one-to-one correspondence. The subtext is methodological. He’s not merely talking about numbers; he’s demonstrating how reason has to be retooled when it enters the infinite. Infinity won’t obey the accounting habits we use for markets, populations, or piles of stones. The phrase “we must say” matters: it signals reluctant precision, an insistence on following the logic even when it offends instinct.
Contextually, this lives in Galileo’s broader campaign to replace inherited certainty with measured, argued knowledge. In his time, mathematical description was becoming the gold standard for understanding nature, but the infinite was still philosophically radioactive. His paradox (later folded into the history that leads to Cantor) exposes a fault line: for infinite sets, “part” can be as numerous as “whole.” That’s not wordplay; it’s a warning label. If you want a science that reaches the cosmos, you have to accept results that feel impossible, because the universe isn’t obligated to be intuitive.
The intent sits in the paradox: you can pair every whole number n with exactly one square n^2, creating a one-to-one correspondence. The subtext is methodological. He’s not merely talking about numbers; he’s demonstrating how reason has to be retooled when it enters the infinite. Infinity won’t obey the accounting habits we use for markets, populations, or piles of stones. The phrase “we must say” matters: it signals reluctant precision, an insistence on following the logic even when it offends instinct.
Contextually, this lives in Galileo’s broader campaign to replace inherited certainty with measured, argued knowledge. In his time, mathematical description was becoming the gold standard for understanding nature, but the infinite was still philosophically radioactive. His paradox (later folded into the history that leads to Cantor) exposes a fault line: for infinite sets, “part” can be as numerous as “whole.” That’s not wordplay; it’s a warning label. If you want a science that reaches the cosmos, you have to accept results that feel impossible, because the universe isn’t obligated to be intuitive.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Galileo Galilei, Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche, intorno a due nuove scienze (Two New Sciences), 1638 — contains the argument comparing natural numbers and their squares (Galileo's paradox). |
More Quotes by Galileo
Add to List






