"We need a reform of the Security Council. It must be perceived as truly representative by all the 191 member states, to uphold the credibility and legitimacy of the UN as the main political arena"
About this Quote
Legitimacy, in Anna Lindh's framing, isn't a moral halo the UN wears by virtue of existing; it's a political asset that can be spent, squandered, or renewed. Her call to reform the Security Council lands with the precision of a diplomat who understands that global governance runs on perception as much as procedure. "It must be perceived as truly representative" is doing the heavy lifting here: she’s not naïvely promising perfect fairness, she’s warning that an institution that looks rigged will be treated as rigged, regardless of what the charter says.
The subtext is an indictment of the post-1945 settlement baked into the Council: five permanent members with veto power, and a rotating cast of everyone else asked to applaud the outcomes. Lindh’s number, "191 member states", matters because it frames the UN as a democratic-looking forum with an oligarchic cockpit. That mismatch becomes a credibility problem the moment the Council authorizes force, imposes sanctions, or fails conspicuously to act. She’s arguing that effectiveness depends on buy-in, and buy-in depends on representation that feels real, not ceremonial.
Context sharpens the stakes. Lindh served in a Europe trying to define itself as a multilateral counterweight to great-power unilateralism, especially in the early 2000s when the UN’s authority was being stress-tested by interventions and divisions among major states. By calling the UN the "main political arena", she’s defending multilateralism while admitting its current architecture can’t keep asking most countries to accept decisions made by a few. Reform, for her, isn’t idealism; it’s preventive maintenance against irrelevance.
The subtext is an indictment of the post-1945 settlement baked into the Council: five permanent members with veto power, and a rotating cast of everyone else asked to applaud the outcomes. Lindh’s number, "191 member states", matters because it frames the UN as a democratic-looking forum with an oligarchic cockpit. That mismatch becomes a credibility problem the moment the Council authorizes force, imposes sanctions, or fails conspicuously to act. She’s arguing that effectiveness depends on buy-in, and buy-in depends on representation that feels real, not ceremonial.
Context sharpens the stakes. Lindh served in a Europe trying to define itself as a multilateral counterweight to great-power unilateralism, especially in the early 2000s when the UN’s authority was being stress-tested by interventions and divisions among major states. By calling the UN the "main political arena", she’s defending multilateralism while admitting its current architecture can’t keep asking most countries to accept decisions made by a few. Reform, for her, isn’t idealism; it’s preventive maintenance against irrelevance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Anna
Add to List


