"We need not be afraid of the future, for the future will be in our own hands"
About this Quote
Confidence is doing a lot of work here. Dewey’s line offers reassurance without the messy vulnerability of admitting what might actually go wrong. “Need not be afraid” frames fear as optional, almost a failure of nerve, and then supplies the antidote: control. The future, he insists, won’t happen to us; it will be “in our own hands.” That phrase is pure midcentury political comfort food - agency, self-reliance, the promise that competent people can manage history like a well-run office.
The intent is pragmatic optimism. Dewey, a Republican defined by managerial calm and reformist instincts, isn’t selling revolution or destiny; he’s selling administration. The subtext is also a quiet rebuke to fatalism. In the early Cold War atmosphere Dewey inhabited, “the future” was a loaded word: nuclear anxiety, ideological brinkmanship, economic reordering. By shifting the frame from threat to stewardship, he tries to turn dread into discipline.
The rhetoric works because it collapses a complex uncertainty into an intimate image. “Our own hands” is tactile, democratic, almost domestic - not the abstract “nation” or “state,” but a collective body making choices. It’s also strategically vague. Who is “we”? Voters, leaders, “free people,” the party? The ambiguity is the point: it invites everyone to feel included while leaving room for authority to define what “our” decisions should be.
In a politician’s mouth, this isn’t just comfort; it’s a claim to legitimacy. If the future is controllable, then the right leaders can be trusted to hold it.
The intent is pragmatic optimism. Dewey, a Republican defined by managerial calm and reformist instincts, isn’t selling revolution or destiny; he’s selling administration. The subtext is also a quiet rebuke to fatalism. In the early Cold War atmosphere Dewey inhabited, “the future” was a loaded word: nuclear anxiety, ideological brinkmanship, economic reordering. By shifting the frame from threat to stewardship, he tries to turn dread into discipline.
The rhetoric works because it collapses a complex uncertainty into an intimate image. “Our own hands” is tactile, democratic, almost domestic - not the abstract “nation” or “state,” but a collective body making choices. It’s also strategically vague. Who is “we”? Voters, leaders, “free people,” the party? The ambiguity is the point: it invites everyone to feel included while leaving room for authority to define what “our” decisions should be.
In a politician’s mouth, this isn’t just comfort; it’s a claim to legitimacy. If the future is controllable, then the right leaders can be trusted to hold it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Optimism |
|---|
More Quotes by Thomas
Add to List







