"We need to drive down requirements for the schools. In the 19th century, we increased the quality of the schools by higher education saying, 'You can't come in unless you have these skills, unless you've taken these courses.' We did that in Wisconsin when I was there, it helped to transform the secondary school system"
About this Quote
Donna Shalala points to a lever that has repeatedly reshaped American schooling: the power of higher education to set clear entrance expectations that cascade backward through the system. The phrase drive down requirements is counterintuitive; she does not mean lowering standards, but pushing rigorous, explicit requirements down into earlier grades so students encounter them sooner. When colleges insist on defined skills and courses, high schools realign curricula, teachers adjust sequences, and students are guided toward the preparation that admission demands.
The historical reference matters. In the late 19th century, universities used entrance exams and prescribed course lists to standardize what a proper secondary education should include. Movements like the Committee of Ten and, soon after, the spread of Carnegie units created a common framework: years of math, lab sciences, foreign language, history, and sustained writing. That signaling from higher education gave secondary schools a target, and quality rose as schools organized around those benchmarks.
Shalala invokes Wisconsin to show how the mechanism works in practice. As the flagship sets tougher, clearer prerequisites, districts respond by strengthening math progressions, adding lab-based sciences, and tightening expectations for reading and writing. The university’s authority and proximity can turn vague aspirations into concrete course taking, assessments, and teacher development. It is the Wisconsin Idea applied to the K-12 pipeline: the public university shaping and serving the state’s broader educational ecosystem.
There is a policy edge here. Standards debates often live inside K-12, but the most potent signals originate at the admissions gate. If colleges say any diploma will do, secondary education fragments. If colleges say you cannot enter without evidence of specific competencies, the system coheres. The strategy is not without risks; without parallel investments, schools with fewer resources can struggle to meet raised bars. But the core insight is durable: clarity at the top organizes effort below, and the admissions threshold is one of the few tools that can align ambition, curriculum, and student preparation at scale.
The historical reference matters. In the late 19th century, universities used entrance exams and prescribed course lists to standardize what a proper secondary education should include. Movements like the Committee of Ten and, soon after, the spread of Carnegie units created a common framework: years of math, lab sciences, foreign language, history, and sustained writing. That signaling from higher education gave secondary schools a target, and quality rose as schools organized around those benchmarks.
Shalala invokes Wisconsin to show how the mechanism works in practice. As the flagship sets tougher, clearer prerequisites, districts respond by strengthening math progressions, adding lab-based sciences, and tightening expectations for reading and writing. The university’s authority and proximity can turn vague aspirations into concrete course taking, assessments, and teacher development. It is the Wisconsin Idea applied to the K-12 pipeline: the public university shaping and serving the state’s broader educational ecosystem.
There is a policy edge here. Standards debates often live inside K-12, but the most potent signals originate at the admissions gate. If colleges say any diploma will do, secondary education fragments. If colleges say you cannot enter without evidence of specific competencies, the system coheres. The strategy is not without risks; without parallel investments, schools with fewer resources can struggle to meet raised bars. But the core insight is durable: clarity at the top organizes effort below, and the admissions threshold is one of the few tools that can align ambition, curriculum, and student preparation at scale.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by Donna
Add to List
