"We need to end permanently the tax that punishes American values of savings and investment and of building small businesses and family farms and ranches"
About this Quote
“End permanently” is doing more work here than any policy detail. Kit Bond isn’t just arguing for a tax change; he’s trying to lock in a moral verdict: the tax in question is not a tool of government but a “punishment.” That single word flips the frame from shared obligation to grievance, making repeal feel like relief from an unjust sentence rather than a redistribution choice with tradeoffs.
The real craft is in the values pileup: “savings,” “investment,” “building,” “small businesses,” “family farms and ranches.” It’s a gallery of American virtue-signifiers, and it’s carefully curated. Savings and investment sound prudent, not affluent. Small businesses read as local and scrappy, not corporate. Family farms and ranches evoke a mythic heartland where wealth is sweat and inheritance is legacy, not privilege. The subtext is that taxing accumulated wealth, especially at death (the likely target is the estate tax), is an attack on the “right kind” of prosperity: earned, rooted, intergenerational.
Context matters: this is classic early-2000s Republican tax rhetoric, built for a coalition of entrepreneurs, rural constituencies, and donors, all under a populist wrapper. The unspoken maneuver is scope: an estate tax affects a narrow slice, but Bond’s language expands its victims to a national archetype. By casting repeal as protection for “family” enterprise, he preemptively delegitimizes counterarguments about inequality or revenue as anti-American, even anti-work. It’s less a debate invitation than a loyalty test: are you with builders, or with the people who “punish” them?
The real craft is in the values pileup: “savings,” “investment,” “building,” “small businesses,” “family farms and ranches.” It’s a gallery of American virtue-signifiers, and it’s carefully curated. Savings and investment sound prudent, not affluent. Small businesses read as local and scrappy, not corporate. Family farms and ranches evoke a mythic heartland where wealth is sweat and inheritance is legacy, not privilege. The subtext is that taxing accumulated wealth, especially at death (the likely target is the estate tax), is an attack on the “right kind” of prosperity: earned, rooted, intergenerational.
Context matters: this is classic early-2000s Republican tax rhetoric, built for a coalition of entrepreneurs, rural constituencies, and donors, all under a populist wrapper. The unspoken maneuver is scope: an estate tax affects a narrow slice, but Bond’s language expands its victims to a national archetype. By casting repeal as protection for “family” enterprise, he preemptively delegitimizes counterarguments about inequality or revenue as anti-American, even anti-work. It’s less a debate invitation than a loyalty test: are you with builders, or with the people who “punish” them?
Quote Details
| Topic | Investment |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Kit
Add to List
