"We need to fashion policies with proper incentives to reduce the amount of carbon we are putting in the atmosphere"
About this Quote
Policy is framed here as carpentry: you "fashion" it, you don't merely announce it. William Ruckelshaus, a lawyer who helped build the modern EPA and twice led it, is signaling a particular kind of environmental realism: the climate problem is less a sermon than a system. The verb choice matters. "Fashion" suggests iterative design, compromise, and enforcement, not moral purity. It’s a quietly legalistic worldview where outcomes follow from rules, and rules work only when they align self-interest with public good.
The phrase "proper incentives" is the tell. Ruckelshaus is sidestepping the culture-war impulse to argue about whether people and companies are virtuous enough to cut emissions. He’s saying they won’t be, at least not reliably, and that expecting voluntary restraint is an expensive fantasy. Incentives are an admission that behavior changes when the cost structure changes: price carbon, reward clean innovation, penalize pollution, and the market will do what moralizing can’t.
There’s also a pragmatic subtext about political durability. Incentive-based policies (carbon taxes, cap-and-trade, performance standards with tradable credits) can outlive administrations because they embed climate action in routine decision-making. Ruckelshaus is speaking from an era when bipartisan environmental governance was plausible and when regulatory agencies were seen as architects of broad public safeguards. Read today, the quote doubles as a critique: we keep arguing about belief and blame while the atmosphere keeps tallying the math.
The phrase "proper incentives" is the tell. Ruckelshaus is sidestepping the culture-war impulse to argue about whether people and companies are virtuous enough to cut emissions. He’s saying they won’t be, at least not reliably, and that expecting voluntary restraint is an expensive fantasy. Incentives are an admission that behavior changes when the cost structure changes: price carbon, reward clean innovation, penalize pollution, and the market will do what moralizing can’t.
There’s also a pragmatic subtext about political durability. Incentive-based policies (carbon taxes, cap-and-trade, performance standards with tradable credits) can outlive administrations because they embed climate action in routine decision-making. Ruckelshaus is speaking from an era when bipartisan environmental governance was plausible and when regulatory agencies were seen as architects of broad public safeguards. Read today, the quote doubles as a critique: we keep arguing about belief and blame while the atmosphere keeps tallying the math.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nature |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List




