"We need to listen to consumers' needs"
About this Quote
A line like "We need to listen to consumers' needs" reads like corporate oxygen: everywhere, supposedly essential, and often so bland it goes unnoticed. Coming from Sumner Redstone - a mogul who built an empire on mass attention through Viacom and CBS - the phrasing does more than nod at customer service. It signals power. "Consumers" isn’t "people" or "audiences"; it’s a market category, a reminder that desire can be measured, packaged, and sold back at scale.
The intent is managerial and strategic: justify decisions by invoking the public, whether that means programming shifts, mergers, or chasing the next platform. In media, "listening" is rarely passive. It’s surveillance with better branding: ratings, focus groups, ad data, and now engagement metrics that turn taste into a dashboard. The subtext is that the company’s mandate isn’t artistic risk or civic duty; it’s responsiveness as a competitive weapon. If you can claim you’re following the audience, you can portray layoffs, cancellations, or consolidation not as boardroom choices but as inevitable compliance with demand.
The context matters: Redstone’s era was defined by conglomeration and the commodification of culture. Cable expansion, franchising, and blockbuster economics rewarded executives who treated attention like oil. "Listening" becomes the moral alibi for monetization: we’re not shaping the public sphere, we’re simply serving it. That’s the neat trick - and why the sentence persists. It flatters consumers with agency while quietly reaffirming who controls the microphone.
The intent is managerial and strategic: justify decisions by invoking the public, whether that means programming shifts, mergers, or chasing the next platform. In media, "listening" is rarely passive. It’s surveillance with better branding: ratings, focus groups, ad data, and now engagement metrics that turn taste into a dashboard. The subtext is that the company’s mandate isn’t artistic risk or civic duty; it’s responsiveness as a competitive weapon. If you can claim you’re following the audience, you can portray layoffs, cancellations, or consolidation not as boardroom choices but as inevitable compliance with demand.
The context matters: Redstone’s era was defined by conglomeration and the commodification of culture. Cable expansion, franchising, and blockbuster economics rewarded executives who treated attention like oil. "Listening" becomes the moral alibi for monetization: we’re not shaping the public sphere, we’re simply serving it. That’s the neat trick - and why the sentence persists. It flatters consumers with agency while quietly reaffirming who controls the microphone.
Quote Details
| Topic | Customer Service |
|---|
More Quotes by Sumner
Add to List





