"We need to lower tax rates for everybody, starting with the top corporate tax rate. We need to simplify the tax code. The ultimate answer, in my opinion, is the fair tax, which is a fair tax for everybody, because as long as we still have this messed-up tax code, the politicians are going to use it to reward winners and losers"
About this Quote
There’s a salesman’s neatness to Herman Cain’s tax pitch: take a sprawling, compromise-riddled system and replace it with a clean, morally legible idea called the “fair tax.” The language is doing two jobs at once. On the surface, it’s a familiar pro-growth agenda: lower rates, simplify the code, start with corporate taxes. Underneath, it’s a distrust-of-government argument disguised as housekeeping. “Messed-up” is the tell; it frames complexity not as the inevitable byproduct of a modern economy, but as evidence of corruption and manipulation.
Cain’s key move is to recast tax policy as a rigged game of political favoritism: “reward winners and losers.” That phrase is less about economic theory than about cultural resentment. It implies that policy outcomes aren’t contested or imperfect; they’re purchased, engineered, and handed out by “politicians.” The subtext is populist even when the prescription is business-friendly: cut corporate taxes first, then sell the entire project as “for everybody.”
The “fair tax” branding is the real rhetorical engine. It turns a specific proposal often associated with a national sales tax and broad base-broadening into a moral claim. “Fair” isn’t defined; it’s asserted, inviting listeners to fill in their own grievances about loopholes, elites, and special treatment.
Context matters: Cain emerged from the business world and rose in a Republican moment when “simplification” and “anti-cronyism” were powerful code words. He’s not just arguing for lower taxes; he’s arguing that the tax code itself is a weapon, and the only way to disarm it is to shrink the state’s ability to choose sides.
Cain’s key move is to recast tax policy as a rigged game of political favoritism: “reward winners and losers.” That phrase is less about economic theory than about cultural resentment. It implies that policy outcomes aren’t contested or imperfect; they’re purchased, engineered, and handed out by “politicians.” The subtext is populist even when the prescription is business-friendly: cut corporate taxes first, then sell the entire project as “for everybody.”
The “fair tax” branding is the real rhetorical engine. It turns a specific proposal often associated with a national sales tax and broad base-broadening into a moral claim. “Fair” isn’t defined; it’s asserted, inviting listeners to fill in their own grievances about loopholes, elites, and special treatment.
Context matters: Cain emerged from the business world and rose in a Republican moment when “simplification” and “anti-cronyism” were powerful code words. He’s not just arguing for lower taxes; he’s arguing that the tax code itself is a weapon, and the only way to disarm it is to shrink the state’s ability to choose sides.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Herman
Add to List




