"We needed to go back on the offense and offer clear leadership on Iraq"
About this Quote
The phrase “clear leadership” is doing quieter, sharper work. It implies the leadership had become muddled, fragmented, or contested, without conceding error. “Clear” suggests the problem isn’t the mission or the premises, but the messaging and coordination: a classic Washington reframing that turns strategic failure into a communications deficit. It also positions Rice as the adult in the room, a stabilizing executive voice offering coherence against a background of policy improvisation.
“Iraq” functions as shorthand for a cluster of anxieties - credibility after WMD claims, alliance management, domestic political fallout - yet the sentence compresses them into a single object that can be “led” through. The intent is managerial and rhetorical: reassert authority, project decisiveness, and convert uncertainty into a demand for unity. Subtext: if the public and the bureaucracy can be made to feel there’s a plan again, the war becomes governable. The line is less about turning the war around than turning the story around.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Rice, Condoleezza. (2026, January 18). We needed to go back on the offense and offer clear leadership on Iraq. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-needed-to-go-back-on-the-offense-and-offer-5869/
Chicago Style
Rice, Condoleezza. "We needed to go back on the offense and offer clear leadership on Iraq." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-needed-to-go-back-on-the-offense-and-offer-5869/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We needed to go back on the offense and offer clear leadership on Iraq." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-needed-to-go-back-on-the-offense-and-offer-5869/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2026.


