"We receive the truths of science by compulsion. Nothing but ignorance is able to resist them"
About this Quote
Wright’s line has the bracing confidence of a 19th-century realist watching metaphysics wobble under the weight of laboratories. “Compulsion” is the tell: science, for him, isn’t a set of tasteful opinions you curate to match your temperament. It’s an external force that pins you down. Gravity doesn’t negotiate, germs don’t care about your theology, and a good experiment has the impolite habit of repeating itself in front of new witnesses. The sentence’s energy comes from flipping a moral category into an epistemic one. “Compulsion” usually belongs to law, coercion, even tyranny; Wright borrows that severity to argue that nature disciplines the mind.
Then comes the scalpel: “Nothing but ignorance is able to resist them.” He doesn’t blame malice, ideology, or sin; he diagnoses resistance as a knowledge problem, which is both more charitable and more cutting. Charitable because it implies the cure is exposure and education. Cutting because it frames dissent not as alternative reasoning but as an absence - a failure to meet the facts where they are. The subtext is a swipe at the genteel tradition of “balanced” belief, the idea that scientific claims sit alongside other “truths” in a polite marketplace. Wright is insisting on an asymmetry: when science works, it doesn’t persuade like rhetoric; it corners you.
Context matters. Wright wrote in post-Darwin America, amid fights over evolution, biblical authority, and the prestige of “scientific” thinking in philosophy. His intent is to harden philosophy’s spine: stop treating nature as something we interpret into meaning, and start treating it as something that compels meaning out of us.
Then comes the scalpel: “Nothing but ignorance is able to resist them.” He doesn’t blame malice, ideology, or sin; he diagnoses resistance as a knowledge problem, which is both more charitable and more cutting. Charitable because it implies the cure is exposure and education. Cutting because it frames dissent not as alternative reasoning but as an absence - a failure to meet the facts where they are. The subtext is a swipe at the genteel tradition of “balanced” belief, the idea that scientific claims sit alongside other “truths” in a polite marketplace. Wright is insisting on an asymmetry: when science works, it doesn’t persuade like rhetoric; it corners you.
Context matters. Wright wrote in post-Darwin America, amid fights over evolution, biblical authority, and the prestige of “scientific” thinking in philosophy. His intent is to harden philosophy’s spine: stop treating nature as something we interpret into meaning, and start treating it as something that compels meaning out of us.
Quote Details
| Topic | Truth |
|---|
More Quotes by Chauncey
Add to List





