"We religious controllers control in the name of Jesus and it is really painful to people"
About this Quote
A confession disguised as an accusation: the phrase "religious controllers" lands like a self-indictment, not a sermon. Miller’s intent feels less like scoring points against faith than naming a particular pathology inside it - the impulse to manage other people’s lives while wearing a halo. The blunt repetition of "control/controllers control" is almost clumsy on purpose, mimicking the circular logic of spiritual authoritarianism: control is justified because control is assumed to be holy.
The key move is "in the name of Jesus". That clause is both shield and weapon. It invokes a sacred authority so large it can swallow dissent: if the mandate is divine, disagreement becomes disobedience. Miller’s subtext is that the harm isn’t incidental; it’s structurally enabled by the rhetoric of righteousness. Power becomes invisible when it’s framed as caretaking, and coercion gets rebranded as "love" or "guidance."
"It is really painful to people" is strikingly understated, almost childlike, which makes it harder to dismiss as polemic. He’s not talking about abstract damage to "society" or "morality" but about lived hurt - shame, fear, fractured families, erased identities. The pain is the receipt.
Contextually, this reads as a late-20th-century/modern religious critique from inside the house, echoing postwar reckonings with institutional authority: churches confronting their own capacity for control, from purity culture to spiritual abuse. Miller isn’t rejecting Jesus; he’s challenging the way Jesus gets used as a brand stamp on domination.
The key move is "in the name of Jesus". That clause is both shield and weapon. It invokes a sacred authority so large it can swallow dissent: if the mandate is divine, disagreement becomes disobedience. Miller’s subtext is that the harm isn’t incidental; it’s structurally enabled by the rhetoric of righteousness. Power becomes invisible when it’s framed as caretaking, and coercion gets rebranded as "love" or "guidance."
"It is really painful to people" is strikingly understated, almost childlike, which makes it harder to dismiss as polemic. He’s not talking about abstract damage to "society" or "morality" but about lived hurt - shame, fear, fractured families, erased identities. The pain is the receipt.
Contextually, this reads as a late-20th-century/modern religious critique from inside the house, echoing postwar reckonings with institutional authority: churches confronting their own capacity for control, from purity culture to spiritual abuse. Miller isn’t rejecting Jesus; he’s challenging the way Jesus gets used as a brand stamp on domination.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Keith
Add to List






