"We shall all respect the principles of each other and do nothing that would be regarded as an act of oppression to any portion of the people"
About this Quote
It reads like a balm, but it’s also a boundary line: respect each other’s principles, or the whole fragile arrangement snaps. Alexander Mackenzie wasn’t tossing off a sentimental plea; he was making a governing promise in a country still inventing itself. In late-19th-century Canada, “principles” often meant religion, language, regional power, and the still-hot question of who Confederation was actually for. The phrase is tuned to a federation where unity can’t be commanded outright; it has to be negotiated.
The brilliance is in how “respect” does double duty. It signals moral restraint, yes, but it also functions as political triage: we will not force uniformity, because the cost of forcing it is fracture. Mackenzie’s diction is careful and legalistic without sounding like a statute. “We shall” is performative confidence, the voice of a state trying to sound older than it is. “Do nothing” is maximalist in tone but minimalist in practical commitment: it promises intention, not outcomes. That’s telling. Oppression can be structural and unintentional; he frames it as an “act,” a discrete deed you can choose not to commit. The subtext is reassurance to anxious minorities and rival provinces while leaving room for policy fights that could still produce unequal results.
“Any portion of the people” is broad enough to feel inclusive, and vague enough to be safely elastic. It’s a nation-building sentence designed to lower the temperature: not a manifesto, a truce dressed up as principle.
The brilliance is in how “respect” does double duty. It signals moral restraint, yes, but it also functions as political triage: we will not force uniformity, because the cost of forcing it is fracture. Mackenzie’s diction is careful and legalistic without sounding like a statute. “We shall” is performative confidence, the voice of a state trying to sound older than it is. “Do nothing” is maximalist in tone but minimalist in practical commitment: it promises intention, not outcomes. That’s telling. Oppression can be structural and unintentional; he frames it as an “act,” a discrete deed you can choose not to commit. The subtext is reassurance to anxious minorities and rival provinces while leaving room for policy fights that could still produce unequal results.
“Any portion of the people” is broad enough to feel inclusive, and vague enough to be safely elastic. It’s a nation-building sentence designed to lower the temperature: not a manifesto, a truce dressed up as principle.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Alexander
Add to List



