"We shall have to remove everything that strangles artistic and scientific creativeness"
About this Quote
A politician promising to unshackle creativity is never just talking about paintings and lab coats. When Alexander Dubcek says, "We shall have to remove everything that strangles artistic and scientific creativeness", he is really naming a political technology: control. "Strangles" is the tell. It casts censorship and bureaucratic micromanagement as a kind of slow violence, not an abstract policy dispute. The line’s force comes from its bodily metaphor, making repression feel intimate and urgent.
Dubcek was speaking from inside a system built to manage imagination as if it were a resource that could be allocated, approved, and safely contained. In the context of the Prague Spring, the sentence doubles as a manifesto for "socialism with a human face": keep the structure, loosen the grip. That tension gives the quote its subtextual charge. He can’t openly declare a break with Soviet orthodoxy, so he elevates creativity as a civic necessity, a neutral-sounding value that quietly implies pluralism, debate, and the right to be wrong in public.
Pairing "artistic" and "scientific" is strategic. Art signals freedom of expression; science signals national competence and modernity. Together they build an argument even party hardliners have to pretend to respect: a society that cannot tolerate new ideas cannot compete, cannot innovate, cannot even truthfully describe itself. The "we" is equally calculated, inviting collective responsibility while gently indicting the state apparatus. It’s reform language with insurgent implications: if creativity is being strangled, someone has their hands on the throat.
Dubcek was speaking from inside a system built to manage imagination as if it were a resource that could be allocated, approved, and safely contained. In the context of the Prague Spring, the sentence doubles as a manifesto for "socialism with a human face": keep the structure, loosen the grip. That tension gives the quote its subtextual charge. He can’t openly declare a break with Soviet orthodoxy, so he elevates creativity as a civic necessity, a neutral-sounding value that quietly implies pluralism, debate, and the right to be wrong in public.
Pairing "artistic" and "scientific" is strategic. Art signals freedom of expression; science signals national competence and modernity. Together they build an argument even party hardliners have to pretend to respect: a society that cannot tolerate new ideas cannot compete, cannot innovate, cannot even truthfully describe itself. The "we" is equally calculated, inviting collective responsibility while gently indicting the state apparatus. It’s reform language with insurgent implications: if creativity is being strangled, someone has their hands on the throat.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Alexander
Add to List





