"We should be trying to make education less expensive, not more"
About this Quote
The line lands like a rebuke delivered in plain clothes: not a manifesto, not a theory, just a moral baseline that implies we have drifted so far we need reminders about direction. Coming from Bob Inglis, a conservative Republican best known for occasionally breaking with his party (most notably on climate), the intent reads as both policy critique and cultural diagnosis. It frames high-cost education not as an unfortunate byproduct of excellence, but as a choice baked into incentives, bureaucracy, and status competition.
The subtext is sharper: American education has started to behave like a luxury good. Price has become a proxy for quality, and institutions have learned that “more” can be justified as “better” even when the spending goes to administrative growth, amenities, and an arms race for prestige rather than instruction. Inglis’ phrasing also nudges the listener toward market logic: if a system that is supposed to expand opportunity is instead multiplying debt, it’s failing its core function.
Context matters because “less expensive” is a politically loaded ask. For some audiences it signals cutting public spending; for others it points to expanding subsidies or regulating tuition. Inglis sidesteps that fight by choosing a broad, almost parental formulation: stop making it worse. That vagueness is the rhetorical trick. It invites agreement across ideological lines while quietly accusing everyone - lawmakers, universities, lenders, even parents chasing brand-name degrees - of participating in a system that’s monetized aspiration.
The subtext is sharper: American education has started to behave like a luxury good. Price has become a proxy for quality, and institutions have learned that “more” can be justified as “better” even when the spending goes to administrative growth, amenities, and an arms race for prestige rather than instruction. Inglis’ phrasing also nudges the listener toward market logic: if a system that is supposed to expand opportunity is instead multiplying debt, it’s failing its core function.
Context matters because “less expensive” is a politically loaded ask. For some audiences it signals cutting public spending; for others it points to expanding subsidies or regulating tuition. Inglis sidesteps that fight by choosing a broad, almost parental formulation: stop making it worse. That vagueness is the rhetorical trick. It invites agreement across ideological lines while quietly accusing everyone - lawmakers, universities, lenders, even parents chasing brand-name degrees - of participating in a system that’s monetized aspiration.
Quote Details
| Topic | Learning |
|---|
More Quotes by Bob
Add to List



