"We should increase our development of alternative fuels, taking advantage of renewable resources, like using corn and sugar to produce ethanol or soybeans to produce biodiesel"
About this Quote
It’s a pitch that tries to make the energy transition feel less like disruption and more like a farm-state upgrade. Jindal’s language is managerial and reassuring: “increase our development,” “taking advantage,” “renewable resources.” The verbs are incremental, the stakes implied rather than declared. No apocalyptic climate framing, no call to sacrifice. Instead, the promise is continuity - America can keep driving and keep growing, just with different inputs.
The specificity of “corn and sugar” and “soybeans” does cultural work. These aren’t abstract “innovations”; they’re familiar commodities tied to rural identity, domestic supply chains, and a politics of self-reliance. The subtext is coalition-building: alternative fuels become a pro-business, pro-agriculture, pro-energy-security agenda that can sit comfortably inside a conservative policy portfolio. It’s climate adjacent without saying “climate,” a way to endorse “renewables” while avoiding the cultural baggage that word can carry in partisan debates.
Context matters because ethanol and biodiesel are also heavily mediated by subsidies, mandates, and lobbying - exactly the kind of government-market entanglement many politicians claim to dislike. That tension sits quietly under the surface. The quote sells a tidy story of renewable ingenuity, but it sidesteps the messier arguments: food vs. fuel debates, land-use impacts, and whether first-generation biofuels meaningfully cut emissions once you count the whole lifecycle.
What makes it work is its strategic concreteness: a green-ish future framed as American crops, American fuel, and a painless next step rather than a reckoning.
The specificity of “corn and sugar” and “soybeans” does cultural work. These aren’t abstract “innovations”; they’re familiar commodities tied to rural identity, domestic supply chains, and a politics of self-reliance. The subtext is coalition-building: alternative fuels become a pro-business, pro-agriculture, pro-energy-security agenda that can sit comfortably inside a conservative policy portfolio. It’s climate adjacent without saying “climate,” a way to endorse “renewables” while avoiding the cultural baggage that word can carry in partisan debates.
Context matters because ethanol and biodiesel are also heavily mediated by subsidies, mandates, and lobbying - exactly the kind of government-market entanglement many politicians claim to dislike. That tension sits quietly under the surface. The quote sells a tidy story of renewable ingenuity, but it sidesteps the messier arguments: food vs. fuel debates, land-use impacts, and whether first-generation biofuels meaningfully cut emissions once you count the whole lifecycle.
What makes it work is its strategic concreteness: a green-ish future framed as American crops, American fuel, and a painless next step rather than a reckoning.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Bobby
Add to List
