"We should not run away from religious teachings. We should run to them"
About this Quote
The subtext is classic Carville: messaging discipline disguised as moral seriousness. He’s not issuing a catechism; he’s arguing that religious teachings remain one of the few mass, emotionally legible vocabularies Americans share. If you abandon that vocabulary, you cede whole communities to opponents who will happily translate policy into parables about duty, family, and justice. “Should” also matters: it’s advice with a wagging finger, a command presented as common sense.
Contextually, this fits the late-20th/early-21st century Democratic hang-up: a coalition strong on policy arguments but often uneasy with the cultural grammar of churchgoing America. Carville, a Catholic-tinged Cajun pragmatist, isn’t asking people to fake belief; he’s urging them to stop acting as if religious teaching is inherently embarrassing or reactionary. The line works because it’s aspirational and combative at once: faith as both refuge and rallying point, a way to talk about ethics without sounding like you’re reading from a white paper.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Carville, James. (2026, January 15). We should not run away from religious teachings. We should run to them. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-should-not-run-away-from-religious-teachings-146374/
Chicago Style
Carville, James. "We should not run away from religious teachings. We should run to them." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-should-not-run-away-from-religious-teachings-146374/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We should not run away from religious teachings. We should run to them." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-should-not-run-away-from-religious-teachings-146374/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2026.






