"We spend more on cows than the poor"
About this Quote
The intent is double-edged. On one side, its an attack on complacent technocracy: stop hiding behind spreadsheets when the outcome is ethically grotesque. On the other, its a tactical strike at the political bargains that make poverty persist even in rich states: agricultural subsidies, trade protections, and the quiet consensus that some forms of welfare (for industries, for owners, for the already-secure) are respectable, while direct support for the poor is treated as suspect or indulgent.
The subtext is aimed at the audience as much as the opposition. Brown is inviting middle voters to see themselves as complicit beneficiaries of a skewed settlement, then offering a moral exit ramp: you can support redistribution without feeling radical, because the current arrangement is what looks extreme. It also carries a global echo: Western farm support distorts markets and undercuts farmers in poorer countries, meaning "spending on cows" is not just a domestic absurdity but an international one.
Its a deliberately crude contrast, and thats why it works: it punctures euphemisms with a single, unignorable image.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Brown, Gordon. (2026, January 15). We spend more on cows than the poor. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-spend-more-on-cows-than-the-poor-82440/
Chicago Style
Brown, Gordon. "We spend more on cows than the poor." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-spend-more-on-cows-than-the-poor-82440/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We spend more on cows than the poor." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-spend-more-on-cows-than-the-poor-82440/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.







