"We think of violence as being conflict and fighting and wars and so forth, but the most ongoing horrific measure of violence is in the horrible poverty of the Third World... and the poverty in the United States as well"
About this Quote
Sheen’s move here is a deliberate reframing: he drags “violence” out of the action-movie frame (wars, fists, explosions) and forces it into the slow, bureaucratic, everyday. That pivot matters because it denies the audience an easy moral posture. It’s comfortable to condemn violence when it’s televised as conflict between obvious sides; it’s much harder when the harm is ambient, normalized, and partially funded by your own comfort.
The phrase “most ongoing horrific measure” is doing heavy lifting. “Ongoing” insists this isn’t a crisis with a neat beginning and end; it’s a condition. “Measure” makes poverty sound like a metric we could track and therefore choose to change, which turns suffering into an indictment of policy, not fate. When Sheen links the “Third World” to “the United States as well,” he undercuts the charity narrative that keeps poverty safely “over there.” The subtext: if you’re moved by violence, you’re already implicated; the border doesn’t absolve you.
Coming from an actor, the intent is also cultural: to widen what we allow ourselves to call violence in public conversation. Sheen isn’t offering a statistic-laden argument; he’s using moral vocabulary as a lever. The rhetorical strategy is plainspoken but strategic, insisting that hunger, preventable disease, and deprivation aren’t tragedies that merely happen - they’re injuries administered by neglect, extraction, and political choice. That’s why the line lands: it shifts blame from “human nature” to human systems, where accountability becomes unavoidable.
The phrase “most ongoing horrific measure” is doing heavy lifting. “Ongoing” insists this isn’t a crisis with a neat beginning and end; it’s a condition. “Measure” makes poverty sound like a metric we could track and therefore choose to change, which turns suffering into an indictment of policy, not fate. When Sheen links the “Third World” to “the United States as well,” he undercuts the charity narrative that keeps poverty safely “over there.” The subtext: if you’re moved by violence, you’re already implicated; the border doesn’t absolve you.
Coming from an actor, the intent is also cultural: to widen what we allow ourselves to call violence in public conversation. Sheen isn’t offering a statistic-laden argument; he’s using moral vocabulary as a lever. The rhetorical strategy is plainspoken but strategic, insisting that hunger, preventable disease, and deprivation aren’t tragedies that merely happen - they’re injuries administered by neglect, extraction, and political choice. That’s why the line lands: it shifts blame from “human nature” to human systems, where accountability becomes unavoidable.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List





