"We thought we'd write a good script for women, giving them the fun roles that generally men get"
About this Quote
A lot is smuggled into that casual “we thought”: an admission that the default settings of Hollywood still treat “good” and “fun” as masculine properties, with women granted gravity, victimhood, or romance as compensation. Andy Wachowski frames the move less as charity than as a genre correction. “Fun roles that generally men get” points to a specific ecosystem of pleasures: agency, swagger, technical competence, the right to be reckless without being punished by the story. It’s the difference between being the quest and being the person the quest is done for.
The intent is pragmatic and insurgent. Pragmatic because it recognizes scripts as infrastructure: you don’t change representation by adding a “strong female character” sticker; you change what the character is allowed to do on screen. Insurgent because it treats the masculine monopoly on action and complexity as arbitrary, not natural. The subtext is that “writing for women” isn’t about softening a story or making it “relatable”; it’s about redistributing narrative power.
Context matters: the Wachowskis emerged in a moment when blockbuster language was still intensely gendered, and “female-led” often meant exception, niche, or moral lesson. Their films didn’t just place women in combat boots; they placed them in the story’s driver’s seat, letting them be cool without apology, lethal without being monstrous, and central without being symbolic. The line also quietly critiques the industry’s imagination deficit: if “fun” has been rationed by gender, the problem isn’t women’s marketability. It’s writers and executives confusing habit for truth.
The intent is pragmatic and insurgent. Pragmatic because it recognizes scripts as infrastructure: you don’t change representation by adding a “strong female character” sticker; you change what the character is allowed to do on screen. Insurgent because it treats the masculine monopoly on action and complexity as arbitrary, not natural. The subtext is that “writing for women” isn’t about softening a story or making it “relatable”; it’s about redistributing narrative power.
Context matters: the Wachowskis emerged in a moment when blockbuster language was still intensely gendered, and “female-led” often meant exception, niche, or moral lesson. Their films didn’t just place women in combat boots; they placed them in the story’s driver’s seat, letting them be cool without apology, lethal without being monstrous, and central without being symbolic. The line also quietly critiques the industry’s imagination deficit: if “fun” has been rationed by gender, the problem isn’t women’s marketability. It’s writers and executives confusing habit for truth.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Andy
Add to List
