"We want to see all demonstrations stopped"
About this Quote
A soft-spoken sentence with a hard-edged purpose: to reframe dissent as a nuisance that responsible adults should simply turn off. Hun Sen’s “We want to see all demonstrations stopped” isn’t just a request for calm; it’s an assertion of ownership over public space and public feeling. The plural “we” does heavy lifting, laundering a leader’s preference into the voice of the state, or even the “reasonable majority.” It implies consensus while sidestepping the fact that demonstrations exist precisely because consensus has failed.
The phrasing is strategically bloodless. “Stopped” avoids the messy verbs of coercion - dispersed, arrested, banned - and offers a sanitized goal that can be sold as stability, safety, economic normalcy. That rhetorical cleanliness is the point: it preemptively casts protesters as destabilizers and positions any crackdown as mere maintenance, not repression.
In Hun Sen’s Cambodia, where power has been consolidated through a long fusion of party, security apparatus, courts, and media pressure, the line reads as both warning and permission slip. It signals to police and loyalists that force will be politically covered; it signals to citizens that the state’s tolerance has expired. The intent isn’t persuasion so much as deterrence: if protest is delegitimized at the level of language, then punishing it becomes easier to justify later.
The deeper subtext is anxiety. A government that truly feels secure can afford noise. A government that demands silence is admitting that visibility - crowds, chants, bodies in streets - is itself a threat.
The phrasing is strategically bloodless. “Stopped” avoids the messy verbs of coercion - dispersed, arrested, banned - and offers a sanitized goal that can be sold as stability, safety, economic normalcy. That rhetorical cleanliness is the point: it preemptively casts protesters as destabilizers and positions any crackdown as mere maintenance, not repression.
In Hun Sen’s Cambodia, where power has been consolidated through a long fusion of party, security apparatus, courts, and media pressure, the line reads as both warning and permission slip. It signals to police and loyalists that force will be politically covered; it signals to citizens that the state’s tolerance has expired. The intent isn’t persuasion so much as deterrence: if protest is delegitimized at the level of language, then punishing it becomes easier to justify later.
The deeper subtext is anxiety. A government that truly feels secure can afford noise. A government that demands silence is admitting that visibility - crowds, chants, bodies in streets - is itself a threat.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Hun
Add to List
