"We want to set a tone going into our fiscal year that starts Feb. 1, that Wal-Mart Stores is going to be aggressive in taking care of customers, taking care of our associates, communications and merchandising"
About this Quote
Lee Scott’s sentence is corporate choreography: a promise of intensity that never quite names the trade-offs. “Set a tone” signals that this is as much about internal mood management as external strategy. It’s the language of a CEO trying to engineer culture from the top down, turning the start of a fiscal year into a reset button. Feb. 1 isn’t just a date; it’s a ritual moment when budgets, bonuses, and priorities get re-lit. The quote is less rallying cry than operating system update.
The key word is “aggressive,” a term that flatters shareholders (growth, margin discipline, market dominance) while reassuring shoppers (lower prices, better in-stocks). It’s a useful ambiguity. Aggression toward competitors can be framed as “taking care of customers.” Aggression on costs can be framed as “taking care of our associates” if it’s packaged as scheduling “efficiency,” training, or selective wage moves. The phrasing performs empathy without committing to measurable concessions.
Scott also quietly stitches together four constituencies that often collide inside big-box retail: customers, workers, the message, and the product mix. “Communications and merchandising” are the tell. This is brand repair as much as retail execution, likely shaped by the era’s scrutiny of Wal-Mart’s labor practices and community impact. By stacking “associates” alongside “customers,” he’s attempting moral symmetry: if the company is attacked for how it treats labor, the rebuttal is that caring for workers is part of the business plan, not a PR afterthought.
It works because it’s aspirational and non-falsifiable: a tone can always be “set,” even if the lived experience on the sales floor says otherwise.
The key word is “aggressive,” a term that flatters shareholders (growth, margin discipline, market dominance) while reassuring shoppers (lower prices, better in-stocks). It’s a useful ambiguity. Aggression toward competitors can be framed as “taking care of customers.” Aggression on costs can be framed as “taking care of our associates” if it’s packaged as scheduling “efficiency,” training, or selective wage moves. The phrasing performs empathy without committing to measurable concessions.
Scott also quietly stitches together four constituencies that often collide inside big-box retail: customers, workers, the message, and the product mix. “Communications and merchandising” are the tell. This is brand repair as much as retail execution, likely shaped by the era’s scrutiny of Wal-Mart’s labor practices and community impact. By stacking “associates” alongside “customers,” he’s attempting moral symmetry: if the company is attacked for how it treats labor, the rebuttal is that caring for workers is part of the business plan, not a PR afterthought.
It works because it’s aspirational and non-falsifiable: a tone can always be “set,” even if the lived experience on the sales floor says otherwise.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Lee
Add to List