"We welcome, we welcome this good cooperation between Russia and NATO"
About this Quote
Diplomacy loves repetition when it wants to sand down sharp edges. Kwasniewski’s doubled “We welcome, we welcome” isn’t clumsy; it’s performative reassurance, the verbal equivalent of an open-palmed gesture. In a post-Cold War Europe still deciding whether security would be shared or parceled into rival camps, the line works as a pressure valve: it lowers the temperature by sounding almost ceremonial, as if cooperation were already normal, already settled.
As a Polish politician, Kwasniewski is speaking from the seam between worlds. Poland’s strategic memory is written in invasions and betrayals, so the phrase “good cooperation” functions as both aspiration and insurance policy. It signals to Western allies that Poland is a credible, pro-NATO actor; it signals to Moscow that NATO’s eastward posture can be narrated as partnership rather than encirclement. The vagueness is the point. “Good” is an adjective that invites everyone to project their preferred meaning onto it: transparency, joint councils, coordinated peacekeeping, or simply a pause in mutual suspicion.
The subtext is about managing audiences at once. In Warsaw, it’s a promise that integration with the West won’t automatically mean perpetual confrontation with Russia. In Brussels and Washington, it’s a bid to keep enlargement and engagement from colliding. In Moscow, it’s a face-saving off-ramp: cooperation can be framed as status, not surrender.
The line’s quiet power is its denial of inevitability. It insists that history’s default setting - rivalry - can be rewritten, if only in carefully chosen, carefully duplicated words.
As a Polish politician, Kwasniewski is speaking from the seam between worlds. Poland’s strategic memory is written in invasions and betrayals, so the phrase “good cooperation” functions as both aspiration and insurance policy. It signals to Western allies that Poland is a credible, pro-NATO actor; it signals to Moscow that NATO’s eastward posture can be narrated as partnership rather than encirclement. The vagueness is the point. “Good” is an adjective that invites everyone to project their preferred meaning onto it: transparency, joint councils, coordinated peacekeeping, or simply a pause in mutual suspicion.
The subtext is about managing audiences at once. In Warsaw, it’s a promise that integration with the West won’t automatically mean perpetual confrontation with Russia. In Brussels and Washington, it’s a bid to keep enlargement and engagement from colliding. In Moscow, it’s a face-saving off-ramp: cooperation can be framed as status, not surrender.
The line’s quiet power is its denial of inevitability. It insists that history’s default setting - rivalry - can be rewritten, if only in carefully chosen, carefully duplicated words.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Aleksander
Add to List



