"We were so fundamental that almost everything had been stripped away from the place of worship. Think of the role words can play, when all other enticements and sensual attractions are gone"
About this Quote
Austere to the point of feeling radical, Houston frames "fundamental" not as piety-with-attitude but as a deliberate subtraction. The line lands with the force of an inventory: almost everything has been "stripped away" from a place built, historically, to overwhelm the senses. Cathedrals trade in stained glass and incense; megachurches lean on lighting cues and music swells. Houston is interested in the opposite experiment: what survives when the aesthetic scaffolding is removed.
The intent is partly documentary, partly challenge. By imagining worship emptied of "enticements and sensual attractions", he spotlights language as the last remaining technology of transcendence. Words, in this view, aren't ornamental. They're load-bearing. They carry doctrine, memory, community, and the choreography of belief when architecture, ritual spectacle, and social pageantry have been minimized.
The subtext is a quiet critique of religious experience as consumption. "Enticements" and "attractions" are the vocabulary of marketing; Houston suggests that when faith starts leaning on those tools, it risks confusing stimulus for substance. There's also an implied respect for communities forged under constraint (whether poverty, persecution, or frontier necessity): when you don't have much, you learn what actually works.
Contextually, Houston, a writer steeped in historical settings, sounds like he's describing a real, pared-down worship space while also making a broader point about narrative itself. Strip the scene, dim the lights, remove the props: what's left is the human voice trying to name the invisible, and the listener deciding whether to be changed by it.
The intent is partly documentary, partly challenge. By imagining worship emptied of "enticements and sensual attractions", he spotlights language as the last remaining technology of transcendence. Words, in this view, aren't ornamental. They're load-bearing. They carry doctrine, memory, community, and the choreography of belief when architecture, ritual spectacle, and social pageantry have been minimized.
The subtext is a quiet critique of religious experience as consumption. "Enticements" and "attractions" are the vocabulary of marketing; Houston suggests that when faith starts leaning on those tools, it risks confusing stimulus for substance. There's also an implied respect for communities forged under constraint (whether poverty, persecution, or frontier necessity): when you don't have much, you learn what actually works.
Contextually, Houston, a writer steeped in historical settings, sounds like he's describing a real, pared-down worship space while also making a broader point about narrative itself. Strip the scene, dim the lights, remove the props: what's left is the human voice trying to name the invisible, and the listener deciding whether to be changed by it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by James
Add to List
