"We will continue to be a big contributor to NATO and our interests will be more secure"
About this Quote
A promise like this is less about NATO than about domestic reassurance: don’t worry, we’re not pulling up the drawbridge. Liam Fox’s line performs a careful balancing act typical of post-austerity, post-Iraq British defence politics, and especially of the Brexit-era need to prove the UK still “counts” internationally. “Big contributor” signals continuity and status without specifying price tags, troop commitments, or political constraints. It’s a brag that doubles as a pre-emptive defence against critics who hear any recalibration of foreign policy as retreat.
The second clause is the real payload: “our interests will be more secure.” That’s a shift from values to self-interest, from collective defence as moral duty to collective defence as insurance policy. The subtext is transactional: we contribute because it buys us protection, leverage, and diplomatic credibility. It’s an argument aimed at skeptics of multilateralism who want a return on investment, and at allies who worry Britain might free-ride while chasing bilateral trade deals.
What makes the sentence work is its strategic vagueness. “Continue” implies there was never a wobble, even if budgets and commitments are always contested. “More secure” is impossible to falsify in real time; it’s an outcome promised in advance, insulating the speaker from messy realities like burden-sharing disputes, Russia’s unpredictability, or Washington’s periodic impatience with Europe. It’s NATO as brand management: stability, seriousness, and a seat at the table, compressed into one tidy assurance.
The second clause is the real payload: “our interests will be more secure.” That’s a shift from values to self-interest, from collective defence as moral duty to collective defence as insurance policy. The subtext is transactional: we contribute because it buys us protection, leverage, and diplomatic credibility. It’s an argument aimed at skeptics of multilateralism who want a return on investment, and at allies who worry Britain might free-ride while chasing bilateral trade deals.
What makes the sentence work is its strategic vagueness. “Continue” implies there was never a wobble, even if budgets and commitments are always contested. “More secure” is impossible to falsify in real time; it’s an outcome promised in advance, insulating the speaker from messy realities like burden-sharing disputes, Russia’s unpredictability, or Washington’s periodic impatience with Europe. It’s NATO as brand management: stability, seriousness, and a seat at the table, compressed into one tidy assurance.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|
More Quotes by Liam
Add to List

