"We will have a border that is open for business, open for tourism, open for legitimate travelers; but that is closed to terrorists and drug pushers and smugglers and others who seek to break the law"
About this Quote
Cellucci’s line is border politics distilled into a retail slogan with a steel core: “open” repeated like a jingle, then slammed shut on a curated list of villains. The intent is managerial and calming. He’s trying to reassure commerce-minded voters and business interests that security won’t strangle cross-border flow, while signaling to anxious constituents that enforcement will be uncompromising. It’s a rhetorical two-step: promise permeability for the “legitimate,” then moral certainty for everyone else.
The subtext hides in that deceptively simple word “legitimate.” It’s doing a lot of sorting without admitting it. Who gets presumed legitimate? Tourists, shoppers, investors, the kind of traveler who leaves receipts. Who becomes suspect? The people most likely to be associated, fairly or not, with “terrorists and drug pushers and smugglers.” By bundling terrorism with drugs and smuggling, the quote collapses different problems into one threatening fog, making the case for tougher policy feel like common sense rather than a political choice.
The phrasing also positions the state as a rational gatekeeper rather than an ideological actor. “Open for business” borrows the language of chambers of commerce, not police departments, suggesting that security is simply the price of a well-run operation. Contextually, this fits the late-1990s/early-2000s trajectory when border talk increasingly fused economic globalization with a rising security mindset: keep trade moving, harden the perimeter, and sell the package as balance. The brilliance - and the risk - is how easily “balance” can become a blank check.
The subtext hides in that deceptively simple word “legitimate.” It’s doing a lot of sorting without admitting it. Who gets presumed legitimate? Tourists, shoppers, investors, the kind of traveler who leaves receipts. Who becomes suspect? The people most likely to be associated, fairly or not, with “terrorists and drug pushers and smugglers.” By bundling terrorism with drugs and smuggling, the quote collapses different problems into one threatening fog, making the case for tougher policy feel like common sense rather than a political choice.
The phrasing also positions the state as a rational gatekeeper rather than an ideological actor. “Open for business” borrows the language of chambers of commerce, not police departments, suggesting that security is simply the price of a well-run operation. Contextually, this fits the late-1990s/early-2000s trajectory when border talk increasingly fused economic globalization with a rising security mindset: keep trade moving, harden the perimeter, and sell the package as balance. The brilliance - and the risk - is how easily “balance” can become a blank check.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List




