"Well, I look at it like this: When you go to a restaurant, the less you know about what happens in the kitchen, the more you enjoy your meal. If the soup tastes good, everything's cool, and you don't necessarily want to know what's in it. The same thing holds true with movies"
About this Quote
Wright is selling a grown-up kind of movie magic: not the wide-eyed belief that cinema is pure, but the practical agreement to stop asking certain questions if the final dish lands. The restaurant metaphor is doing a lot of work because it’s simultaneously comforting and faintly ominous. Kitchens are where craft lives, sure, but they’re also where you find mess, stress, compromises, and the occasional health-code violation. By choosing soup - the most blendable, hardest-to-audit food on the menu - he hints at how movies are made from scraps: rewritten scenes, patched performances, salvaged budgets, personalities simmering past the point of politeness.
The intent reads like a defense mechanism and a gentle warning. Audiences increasingly want transparency: behind-the-scenes footage, production gossip, “what really happened” podcasts, and social media autopsies of every creative decision. Wright’s point is that too much access can flatten the experience. The more you treat a film like an exposable process, the less room there is for surrender, surprise, or emotional impact. It’s not anti-curiosity; it’s pro-enchantment.
There’s also a subtle industry critique baked in. If you knew “what’s in it,” you might not enjoy the meal: exploitative hours, bruised egos, studio notes, algorithmic casting, the politics of who gets credit. The line quietly reframes acting too. Wright isn’t romanticizing the kitchen; he’s saying the job is to make the soup taste good, even when the pot is chaotic. That’s professionalism - and maybe a plea to let the work be the work.
The intent reads like a defense mechanism and a gentle warning. Audiences increasingly want transparency: behind-the-scenes footage, production gossip, “what really happened” podcasts, and social media autopsies of every creative decision. Wright’s point is that too much access can flatten the experience. The more you treat a film like an exposable process, the less room there is for surrender, surprise, or emotional impact. It’s not anti-curiosity; it’s pro-enchantment.
There’s also a subtle industry critique baked in. If you knew “what’s in it,” you might not enjoy the meal: exploitative hours, bruised egos, studio notes, algorithmic casting, the politics of who gets credit. The line quietly reframes acting too. Wright isn’t romanticizing the kitchen; he’s saying the job is to make the soup taste good, even when the pot is chaotic. That’s professionalism - and maybe a plea to let the work be the work.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|
More Quotes by Jeffrey
Add to List
