"Well I think effects are tools"
About this Quote
“Effects are tools” is del Toro quietly rejecting a whole era of filmmaking discourse where spectacle gets treated like either a moral failing (“too much CGI”) or a flex (“look what we can render”). He’s stripping the drama out of it. Tools don’t confer meaning on their own; they extend the maker’s hand. That framing is classic del Toro: craft-first, monster-loving, and stubbornly humanist about technique.
The intent is almost defensive, but not apologetic. Del Toro has spent decades working in the overlap zone: tactile creature suits, animatronics, miniatures, digital augmentation. His films (Pan’s Labyrinth, The Shape of Water, Pacific Rim) argue that the audience doesn’t actually care whether a tentacle was latex or pixels; they care whether it feels like it belongs to a story with emotional pressure. By calling effects “tools,” he’s re-centering authorship: the question isn’t “practical vs. digital,” it’s “what does the moment need to land?”
The subtext also jabs at a tech industry narrative that sells effects as destiny. New software arrives and suddenly every filmmaker is expected to chase the same weightless sheen. Del Toro’s line pushes back: technology is subordinate to taste, to design, to intention. It’s a reminder that the most convincing illusion in cinema isn’t photorealism; it’s conviction. Effects can be invisible, baroque, or outright theatrical. The failure isn’t using them. The failure is mistaking the hammer for the cathedral.
The intent is almost defensive, but not apologetic. Del Toro has spent decades working in the overlap zone: tactile creature suits, animatronics, miniatures, digital augmentation. His films (Pan’s Labyrinth, The Shape of Water, Pacific Rim) argue that the audience doesn’t actually care whether a tentacle was latex or pixels; they care whether it feels like it belongs to a story with emotional pressure. By calling effects “tools,” he’s re-centering authorship: the question isn’t “practical vs. digital,” it’s “what does the moment need to land?”
The subtext also jabs at a tech industry narrative that sells effects as destiny. New software arrives and suddenly every filmmaker is expected to chase the same weightless sheen. Del Toro’s line pushes back: technology is subordinate to taste, to design, to intention. It’s a reminder that the most convincing illusion in cinema isn’t photorealism; it’s conviction. Effects can be invisible, baroque, or outright theatrical. The failure isn’t using them. The failure is mistaking the hammer for the cathedral.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Toro, Guillermo del. (2026, January 17). Well I think effects are tools. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/well-i-think-effects-are-tools-55314/
Chicago Style
Toro, Guillermo del. "Well I think effects are tools." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/well-i-think-effects-are-tools-55314/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Well I think effects are tools." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/well-i-think-effects-are-tools-55314/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.
More Quotes by Guillermo
Add to List



