"Well I've already made it clear that it's a matter for individuals in exercising their own judgement, their own consciences to speak freely on matters of policy"
About this Quote
There’s a special kind of political jujitsu in “I’ve already made it clear”: a pre-emptive scold dressed up as reassurance. Ron Davies frames the issue as personal conscience and individual judgment, not party line or government agenda, which sounds liberal and high-minded. The move is strategic. By relocating “matters of policy” into the realm of private moral choice, he defuses pressure for a definitive position while still appearing to defend openness.
The phrasing does two jobs at once. “Individuals” and “their own” repeats like a shield, building a rhetorical firewall between the speaker and whatever comes next. If the policy debate turns ugly, divisive, or politically costly, responsibility is dispersed: it’s not the leadership’s stance, it’s a collection of personal convictions. At the same time, “to speak freely” signals tolerance and pluralism, a nod to democratic virtue that can play well in public and within a fractious party.
The subtext is less about liberty than about management. This is what politicians say when they’re trying to keep a coalition intact: allow dissent without letting it look like disarray. The sentence is careful to invoke conscience while subtly narrowing the battlefield: it’s about speech, not necessarily about changing outcomes. Freedom to speak becomes a substitute for commitment to act.
Contextually, this kind of language often surfaces around ethically charged votes or internal rebellions, where “free vote” politics is used to avoid forcing unity in situations where unity would be brittle - or electorally dangerous.
The phrasing does two jobs at once. “Individuals” and “their own” repeats like a shield, building a rhetorical firewall between the speaker and whatever comes next. If the policy debate turns ugly, divisive, or politically costly, responsibility is dispersed: it’s not the leadership’s stance, it’s a collection of personal convictions. At the same time, “to speak freely” signals tolerance and pluralism, a nod to democratic virtue that can play well in public and within a fractious party.
The subtext is less about liberty than about management. This is what politicians say when they’re trying to keep a coalition intact: allow dissent without letting it look like disarray. The sentence is careful to invoke conscience while subtly narrowing the battlefield: it’s about speech, not necessarily about changing outcomes. Freedom to speak becomes a substitute for commitment to act.
Contextually, this kind of language often surfaces around ethically charged votes or internal rebellions, where “free vote” politics is used to avoid forcing unity in situations where unity would be brittle - or electorally dangerous.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Ron
Add to List
