"We'll make our voices heard loud and clear on the importance of cost-based power"
About this Quote
Cantwell’s line is the kind of Washington promise engineered to sound like a battle cry while staying safely inside the guardrails of policy-speak. “We’ll make our voices heard” frames her side as the aggrieved grown-ups in a room of irresponsible actors: not just advocating, but insisting on being counted in a process that might otherwise be captured by industry or ideology. The phrase “loud and clear” is performative toughness, a preemptive answer to critics who accuse Democrats of being soft on energy reliability or too cozy with regulators. It also signals coalition politics: “we” is doing a lot of work, inviting ratepayer advocates, Northwest utilities, and manufacturing interests under one umbrella.
“Cost-based power” is the real tell. It’s a term that sounds dull on purpose, like a laminated spreadsheet, but it carries a sharp ideological edge. In energy markets, “cost-based” evokes traditional regulation: rates tied to the actual cost of generating and delivering electricity, rather than whatever the market can extract during scarcity. That’s a populist argument disguised as technocracy, aimed at voters who don’t follow FERC dockets but absolutely notice their utility bill.
The subtext is conflict with market-based pricing, price spikes, and the broader push-pull between deregulation and consumer protection. Cantwell, a senator from Washington with deep hydropower stakes, is telegraphing that “reliability” shouldn’t become a euphemism for higher profits. By choosing bureaucratic language, she’s trying to win the legitimacy contest: the side with “cost-based” power gets to claim it’s merely defending fairness, not picking winners.
“Cost-based power” is the real tell. It’s a term that sounds dull on purpose, like a laminated spreadsheet, but it carries a sharp ideological edge. In energy markets, “cost-based” evokes traditional regulation: rates tied to the actual cost of generating and delivering electricity, rather than whatever the market can extract during scarcity. That’s a populist argument disguised as technocracy, aimed at voters who don’t follow FERC dockets but absolutely notice their utility bill.
The subtext is conflict with market-based pricing, price spikes, and the broader push-pull between deregulation and consumer protection. Cantwell, a senator from Washington with deep hydropower stakes, is telegraphing that “reliability” shouldn’t become a euphemism for higher profits. By choosing bureaucratic language, she’s trying to win the legitimacy contest: the side with “cost-based” power gets to claim it’s merely defending fairness, not picking winners.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Maria
Add to List



