"Well, maybe it has to do with the fact that I was a complete Hitchcock fanatic from age 9"
About this Quote
A nine-year-old declaring himself a "complete Hitchcock fanatic" isn’t just cute trivia; it’s a self-portrait in origin-story form. Maupin frames obsession as destiny. The adverb “complete” matters: it’s not casual admiration but total immersion, the kind that wires a sensibility early and permanently. Hitchcock isn’t simply a director in this line; he’s a training ground for how to look at the world.
The intent is gently disarming, almost offhand, but it’s also a claim to craft. Hitchcock teaches you that tone is a form of power: suspense built from what’s withheld, humor smuggled into fear, the camera lingering just long enough to make desire and danger indistinguishable. By invoking him, Maupin nods to a toolkit of narrative control - misdirection, revelation, the choreography of attention. He’s suggesting that whatever trait you’re noticing in his work (a taste for melodrama, a knack for plotting, a fascination with secret lives) didn’t appear late; it was rehearsed from childhood.
The subtext is about spectatorship and outsiderhood. A kid who falls hard for Hitchcock often falls for the idea that normal life has trapdoors. That’s a useful orientation for a novelist attentive to hidden identities, coded signals, and the social performance of respectability. Contextually, it’s also a generational marker: pre-streaming, pre-internet devotion, when “fanatic” meant seeking, rewatching, memorizing - building an inner library. Maupin makes influence sound like inevitability, then uses that inevitability to explain his own narrative instincts without pleading for them.
The intent is gently disarming, almost offhand, but it’s also a claim to craft. Hitchcock teaches you that tone is a form of power: suspense built from what’s withheld, humor smuggled into fear, the camera lingering just long enough to make desire and danger indistinguishable. By invoking him, Maupin nods to a toolkit of narrative control - misdirection, revelation, the choreography of attention. He’s suggesting that whatever trait you’re noticing in his work (a taste for melodrama, a knack for plotting, a fascination with secret lives) didn’t appear late; it was rehearsed from childhood.
The subtext is about spectatorship and outsiderhood. A kid who falls hard for Hitchcock often falls for the idea that normal life has trapdoors. That’s a useful orientation for a novelist attentive to hidden identities, coded signals, and the social performance of respectability. Contextually, it’s also a generational marker: pre-streaming, pre-internet devotion, when “fanatic” meant seeking, rewatching, memorizing - building an inner library. Maupin makes influence sound like inevitability, then uses that inevitability to explain his own narrative instincts without pleading for them.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Armistead
Add to List

