"Well the Bombay film wasn't always like how it is now. It did have a local industry. There were realistic films made on local scenes. But it gradually changed over the years"
About this Quote
There is a quiet lament tucked into Ray's calm, almost offhand phrasing: an entire ecology of storytelling got paved over. By calling it "Bombay film" rather than the now-brand-like "Bollywood", he’s pointing to a time before the industry became an export product and a style template. The key move is the contrast between "local industry" and what followed. "Local" here isn’t parochial; it’s an aesthetic and moral claim. It means movies that observed lived textures - streets, speech, class friction, regional rhythms - instead of smoothing them into an all-India fantasy.
Ray’s choice of "realistic films" is loaded because he was repeatedly cast as the apostle of realism, sometimes unfairly, against a Bombay machine associated with spectacle. He’s not simply praising neorealism or scolding song-and-dance. He’s marking a shift in what cinema is for: from reflecting a place to manufacturing a mass consensus about what "Indian" looks like, sounds like, desires like. "Gradually changed" is the diplomatic phrasing of a sharper accusation: commercial incentives and centralized power don’t just influence art, they reroute it.
Context matters. Ray came up after Independence, when cultural identity was being assembled in public, and cinema was one of the loudest tools. His own work proved that "local scenes" could be globally legible without being culturally diluted. The subtext is not nostalgia; it’s a warning about homogenization - how an industry can grow bigger and, in the process, see less.
Ray’s choice of "realistic films" is loaded because he was repeatedly cast as the apostle of realism, sometimes unfairly, against a Bombay machine associated with spectacle. He’s not simply praising neorealism or scolding song-and-dance. He’s marking a shift in what cinema is for: from reflecting a place to manufacturing a mass consensus about what "Indian" looks like, sounds like, desires like. "Gradually changed" is the diplomatic phrasing of a sharper accusation: commercial incentives and centralized power don’t just influence art, they reroute it.
Context matters. Ray came up after Independence, when cultural identity was being assembled in public, and cinema was one of the loudest tools. His own work proved that "local scenes" could be globally legible without being culturally diluted. The subtext is not nostalgia; it’s a warning about homogenization - how an industry can grow bigger and, in the process, see less.
Quote Details
| Topic | Movie |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Satyajit
Add to List


