"Well, the hardest thing to do, as we know from our own experience on 9/11 is protect everything all the time"
About this Quote
The line lands like a grim administrative truth dressed in the language of shared trauma. Abizaid isn’t trying to poetize 9/11; he’s using it as a credential and a shield, a way to make a hard argument feel less like policy preference and more like lived inevitability. “As we know” recruits the listener into a collective memory: you’re not allowed to be naive here, because you were there too (or at least you remember). That rhetorical move matters. It converts a contested debate about risk, budgets, and strategy into an almost moral consensus: absolute security is impossible, so perfection can’t be the standard by which leaders are judged.
“Protect everything all the time” is the tell. The phrasing is totalizing on purpose, exaggerating the demand for safety until it becomes obviously unreasonable. It subtly rebukes a public and a political class that oscillate between wanting omnipresent protection and condemning institutions the moment they fail. In soldier-speak, it’s also a quiet defense of triage: you prioritize, you accept vulnerabilities, you choose which assets and spaces get covered.
Contextually, Abizaid is speaking from the post-9/11 security state, when America was building vast counterterror architectures while discovering that open societies are porous by design. The intent isn’t resignation; it’s expectation management. The subtext is: if you want zero-risk, you’re asking for a different country - one with a different relationship to freedom, privacy, and the normal messiness of public life.
“Protect everything all the time” is the tell. The phrasing is totalizing on purpose, exaggerating the demand for safety until it becomes obviously unreasonable. It subtly rebukes a public and a political class that oscillate between wanting omnipresent protection and condemning institutions the moment they fail. In soldier-speak, it’s also a quiet defense of triage: you prioritize, you accept vulnerabilities, you choose which assets and spaces get covered.
Contextually, Abizaid is speaking from the post-9/11 security state, when America was building vast counterterror architectures while discovering that open societies are porous by design. The intent isn’t resignation; it’s expectation management. The subtext is: if you want zero-risk, you’re asking for a different country - one with a different relationship to freedom, privacy, and the normal messiness of public life.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List

