"Well, the U.S. is running a current account deficit; we are creating lots of investment opportunities in the United States that exceed our own domestic savings rates, so the issue here is to encourage higher savings rates in the United States"
About this Quote
A current account deficit is the driest possible setup for a political message, and Snow uses it like a velvet glove over a hard argument: the problem isn’t “global imbalances” or policy choices that make borrowing cheap and consumption easy, it’s Americans not saving enough. The phrasing sounds technocratic, but it quietly reallocates responsibility. By defining the deficit as a byproduct of “creating lots of investment opportunities,” he reframes dependence on foreign capital as evidence of U.S. dynamism, not vulnerability. The deficit becomes a compliment.
Then comes the pivot: “the issue here is to encourage higher savings rates.” That’s not a neutral diagnosis; it’s a policy cue. “Encourage” is carefully evasive, suggesting virtuous persuasion rather than hard trade-offs like tighter fiscal policy, reduced deficits, or constraints on credit-driven consumption. It also sidesteps the politically radioactive reality that “higher savings” can mean lower household spending, slower growth, or painful adjustments - especially when wages stagnate and saving is a luxury good.
The subtext lands squarely in early-2000s Washington: reassure markets and voters that foreign inflows are fine, and relocate the fix to private behavior rather than public budgets. It’s an economist’s version of moral language, dressed up as macroeconomics: thrift as patriotism. In that sense, Snow isn’t just describing an accounting identity; he’s selling a narrative in which America’s imbalances are less a warning light than a branding exercise - an invitation for capital, with the bill politely handed to households.
Then comes the pivot: “the issue here is to encourage higher savings rates.” That’s not a neutral diagnosis; it’s a policy cue. “Encourage” is carefully evasive, suggesting virtuous persuasion rather than hard trade-offs like tighter fiscal policy, reduced deficits, or constraints on credit-driven consumption. It also sidesteps the politically radioactive reality that “higher savings” can mean lower household spending, slower growth, or painful adjustments - especially when wages stagnate and saving is a luxury good.
The subtext lands squarely in early-2000s Washington: reassure markets and voters that foreign inflows are fine, and relocate the fix to private behavior rather than public budgets. It’s an economist’s version of moral language, dressed up as macroeconomics: thrift as patriotism. In that sense, Snow isn’t just describing an accounting identity; he’s selling a narrative in which America’s imbalances are less a warning light than a branding exercise - an invitation for capital, with the bill politely handed to households.
Quote Details
| Topic | Saving Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List


