"Well, WorldCom's growth exploded in the Clinton years, there's no question, there's no disputing that"
About this Quote
A corporate scandal gets reframed as a partisan victory lap, and the sleight of hand is the point. Don Nickles’ line is engineered to sound like a sober concession to “facts” while quietly swapping moral categories: “growth” becomes the headline, not what that growth was built on. By stacking certainties (“there’s no question, there’s no disputing that”), he borrows the cadence of courtroom proof to pre-empt the obvious rebuttal: WorldCom’s expansion in the 1990s was inseparable from the era’s deal frenzy, deregulatory confidence, and accounting games that later detonated.
The intent is less to defend WorldCom than to weaponize it as a symbol. “Exploded” is doing double duty: it flatters the Clinton-era economy with a burst of private-sector energy, but it also, unintentionally, echoes the company’s eventual implosion. Nickles uses the ambiguity to keep the sentence clean of explicit accusation while still letting listeners connect dots in their preferred direction.
Context matters: the late ’90s telecom boom rewarded scale at any cost, and Washington’s prevailing mood treated ballooning market caps as evidence of national competence. After WorldCom’s collapse, the political incentive flipped. Pointing to Clinton years allows a Republican lawmaker to suggest permissiveness, coziness with corporate power, or regulatory laxity without making a falsifiable claim about who cooked the books.
It works because it’s a classic Washington move: launder a narrative through “undisputed” chronology. Yes, the timeline is true. The implication is the real argument.
The intent is less to defend WorldCom than to weaponize it as a symbol. “Exploded” is doing double duty: it flatters the Clinton-era economy with a burst of private-sector energy, but it also, unintentionally, echoes the company’s eventual implosion. Nickles uses the ambiguity to keep the sentence clean of explicit accusation while still letting listeners connect dots in their preferred direction.
Context matters: the late ’90s telecom boom rewarded scale at any cost, and Washington’s prevailing mood treated ballooning market caps as evidence of national competence. After WorldCom’s collapse, the political incentive flipped. Pointing to Clinton years allows a Republican lawmaker to suggest permissiveness, coziness with corporate power, or regulatory laxity without making a falsifiable claim about who cooked the books.
It works because it’s a classic Washington move: launder a narrative through “undisputed” chronology. Yes, the timeline is true. The implication is the real argument.
Quote Details
| Topic | Business |
|---|
More Quotes by Don
Add to List
