"We’re currently in a state where there’s a danger of just pissing away Russia. So we should declare martial law, we should declare new waves of mobilization, and we need to transfer everybody we can to work on ammunition production. We need to cut the fat, stop building new roads and new infrastructure, and work only on the war"
About this Quote
Prigozhin’s phrasing is deliberately crude, because crudity is the point: it casts the war not as a complicated political project but as a sacred emergency being squandered by soft, pampered elites. “Pissing away Russia” is a moral accusation disguised as a tactical critique, meant to shame both the state and the public into accepting harsher measures as the only adult response to looming humiliation.
The demands escalate in a careful ladder: martial law, more mobilization, total industrial conversion. Each step normalizes the next, moving the listener from “we’re in trouble” to “your civilian life is the problem.” When he says “cut the fat” and stop building roads, he’s not only arguing about budgets. He’s attacking the post-Soviet social contract that promised rising living standards in exchange for political passivity. In his framing, consumer normalcy becomes treasonous decadence.
Context matters: Prigozhin built his brand as the blunt, frontline truth-teller, contrasting himself with bureaucrats who speak in euphemisms. This is wartime populism aimed upward as much as outward, a bid to seize authority by claiming authenticity. The subtext is a power play: if the state won’t act like a war state, he’s offering himself as the man willing to do it. The danger isn’t just the policy prescription; it’s the rhetorical gambit that turns national survival into a license for coercion, and turns dissent or fatigue into evidence of national decay.
The demands escalate in a careful ladder: martial law, more mobilization, total industrial conversion. Each step normalizes the next, moving the listener from “we’re in trouble” to “your civilian life is the problem.” When he says “cut the fat” and stop building roads, he’s not only arguing about budgets. He’s attacking the post-Soviet social contract that promised rising living standards in exchange for political passivity. In his framing, consumer normalcy becomes treasonous decadence.
Context matters: Prigozhin built his brand as the blunt, frontline truth-teller, contrasting himself with bureaucrats who speak in euphemisms. This is wartime populism aimed upward as much as outward, a bid to seize authority by claiming authenticity. The subtext is a power play: if the state won’t act like a war state, he’s offering himself as the man willing to do it. The danger isn’t just the policy prescription; it’s the rhetorical gambit that turns national survival into a license for coercion, and turns dissent or fatigue into evidence of national decay.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Yevgeny
Add to List
