"We're going to see fugitives and felons, eventually, being able to get guns much more easily"
About this Quote
Brady’s line is built to sound like a forecast, but it functions as an indictment. “We’re going to see” doesn’t argue policy on its merits; it claims inevitability, pressing the listener into the role of eyewitness before the evidence arrives. That rhetorical move matters because gun debates often stall in abstractions (rights, statistics, constitutional theory). Brady yanks it back to a scene: people you’re already primed to fear, now armed.
The phrase “fugitives and felons” is deliberately blunt. It’s not “criminals,” which can feel distant or theoretical; it’s two hard nouns that conjure an America of manhunts, parole violations, and repeat offenders. She’s constructing a moral hierarchy: law-abiding “us” versus law-breaking “them.” Activism often needs that clarity to mobilize, but the subtext is also a warning about whose safety counts in public imagination. The fear being activated is less about crime in general than about the state losing control of who gets lethal power.
“Eventually” is doing quiet work. It acknowledges that loosening gun access may not trigger immediate catastrophe, while insisting the arc bends toward harm. It’s a preemptive rebuttal to the common counter-claim: “Nothing happened after the last change.” Brady’s politics, rooted in the gun control movement that surged after high-profile shootings and around the Brady Bill era, leans on a public-health logic: small regulatory shifts can compound into large downstream consequences.
Even “much more easily” is calibrated. She’s not predicting new criminal intent; she’s targeting friction in the system. Make acquisition simpler, she implies, and the worst actors will exploit that simplicity first.
The phrase “fugitives and felons” is deliberately blunt. It’s not “criminals,” which can feel distant or theoretical; it’s two hard nouns that conjure an America of manhunts, parole violations, and repeat offenders. She’s constructing a moral hierarchy: law-abiding “us” versus law-breaking “them.” Activism often needs that clarity to mobilize, but the subtext is also a warning about whose safety counts in public imagination. The fear being activated is less about crime in general than about the state losing control of who gets lethal power.
“Eventually” is doing quiet work. It acknowledges that loosening gun access may not trigger immediate catastrophe, while insisting the arc bends toward harm. It’s a preemptive rebuttal to the common counter-claim: “Nothing happened after the last change.” Brady’s politics, rooted in the gun control movement that surged after high-profile shootings and around the Brady Bill era, leans on a public-health logic: small regulatory shifts can compound into large downstream consequences.
Even “much more easily” is calibrated. She’s not predicting new criminal intent; she’s targeting friction in the system. Make acquisition simpler, she implies, and the worst actors will exploit that simplicity first.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Sarah
Add to List




