Parenting & Family Quote by Neil Cavuto

Cavuto is taking a swing at the soft tyranny of surface-level virtue: the way we smuggle character judgments into aesthetics and then pretend its harmless. “Toothy smile” and “fine head of hair” aren’t random examples; they’re the kind of camera-friendly assets that TV culture turns into shorthand for trustworthiness, vitality, competence. By calling them “vague and relatively meaningless,” he’s puncturing the unspoken deal that lets media - and parents, and schools, and advertising - treat appearance as an ethical résumé.

The line’s real target is the pipeline from childhood to consumer identity. “We’re teaching our kids” assigns collective blame, not to a single industry villain but to a whole ecosystem that rewards good looks with attention and then calls the attention “merit.” The phrasing also hints at a moral panic about what children absorb when adults praise packaging more readily than patience, curiosity, or resilience. Cavuto’s subtext: you can’t raise kids to value substance while bathing them in signals that say the opposite.

Context matters because Cavuto speaks from inside the image machine. As a TV journalist, he understands how quickly audiences read faces as policy positions. That insider vantage gives the critique bite: it’s less a scold than an admission that the medium profits from the very confusion he’s naming. The sentence works because it exposes a familiar habit - complimenting appearance as if it’s destiny - and reframes it as cultural training, not personal preference.