"Western concepts of ownership and privatization came in and clashed with that. So land began to be exchanged"
About this Quote
You can hear the bureaucratic restraint doing overtime here: “came in and clashed” is a polite way to describe a historical collision with winners, losers, and paperwork that sticks for generations. Neil Abercrombie, a politician shaped by Hawaii’s long argument over land, frames the shift to private property as something imported - an outside logic arriving with its own vocabulary and enforcement mechanisms. The verb choice matters. Concepts don’t just “arrive” by themselves; they are carried by institutions: courts, surveys, deeds, taxation, and ultimately police power. By turning agency into abstraction (“concepts... came in”), the line mirrors how dispossession often gets narrated in official settings: as modernization rather than conquest.
The second sentence lands like a quiet trigger. “So land began to be exchanged” compresses a radical transformation - from land as lineage, stewardship, and reciprocal obligation to land as commodity. “Exchanged” sounds neutral, even consensual, but it smuggles in a whole market worldview: land becomes legible to outsiders, divisible, mortgageable, foreclosable. The subtext is that once you can exchange land, you can lose it, and losing it can be framed as an ordinary outcome rather than a structural outcome.
In context, Abercrombie is likely signaling two audiences at once: acknowledging Indigenous or customary systems without romanticizing them, while critiquing the West’s property regime without declaring war on it. It’s a politician’s balancing act - but the sentence still exposes the core truth: privatization doesn’t merely reorganize land. It reorganizes power.
The second sentence lands like a quiet trigger. “So land began to be exchanged” compresses a radical transformation - from land as lineage, stewardship, and reciprocal obligation to land as commodity. “Exchanged” sounds neutral, even consensual, but it smuggles in a whole market worldview: land becomes legible to outsiders, divisible, mortgageable, foreclosable. The subtext is that once you can exchange land, you can lose it, and losing it can be framed as an ordinary outcome rather than a structural outcome.
In context, Abercrombie is likely signaling two audiences at once: acknowledging Indigenous or customary systems without romanticizing them, while critiquing the West’s property regime without declaring war on it. It’s a politician’s balancing act - but the sentence still exposes the core truth: privatization doesn’t merely reorganize land. It reorganizes power.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Neil
Add to List





